Suppr超能文献

拔除上颌牙时腭部注射是否必要?一项系统评价

Palatal injection for removal of maxillary teeth: is it required? A systematic review.

作者信息

Badenoch-Jones E K, Lincoln T

机构信息

School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Maxillofacial Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;45(10):1283-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 30.

Abstract

There is a growing body of work examining whether a palatal injection is necessary for the extraction of maxillary teeth with contemporary local anaesthetics. The available literature was reviewed systematically by conducting a search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for trials examining outcomes of maxillary tooth extraction where buccal injection of local anaesthetic only was used for one or more test groups. The selected studies were reviewed for study type, sample size, quality, participant characteristics and methodology, outcome variables, and findings. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Four studies were controlled clinical trials that did not report randomization. Five were clinical trials that were not controlled and examined outcomes of one or more test groups. The pain of local anaesthetic injection(s) in the test group (buccal injection only) versus control group (buccal and palatal injection), number of cases requiring supplemental buccal or palatal injection in cases of unsuccessful local anaesthesia, and pain during the procedure were designated as primary outcomes. Pain on probing of the mucosa was designated as a secondary outcome. All nine controlled studies that assessed pain during the procedure found no statistically significant difference between the test and control groups.

摘要

越来越多的研究在探讨,对于使用当代局部麻醉剂拔除上颌牙而言,腭部注射是否必要。通过检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库,系统回顾了现有文献,以查找仅在一个或多个试验组中使用颊部局部麻醉剂注射来评估上颌牙拔除结果的试验。对选定的研究进行了审查,内容包括研究类型、样本量、质量、参与者特征和方法、结果变量以及研究结果。15项研究符合纳入标准。其中6项研究为随机对照试验。4项研究为未报告随机分组情况的对照临床试验。5项为非对照临床试验,研究了一个或多个试验组的结果。试验组(仅颊部注射)与对照组(颊部和腭部注射)局部麻醉剂注射的疼痛程度、局部麻醉失败时需要补充颊部或腭部注射的病例数量以及手术过程中的疼痛被指定为主要结果。黏膜探查时的疼痛被指定为次要结果。所有9项评估手术过程中疼痛的对照研究均发现,试验组与对照组之间在统计学上无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验