Yang Ming, Wu Elizabeth, Rao Huiying, Du Fanny H, Xie Angela, Cheng Shanna, Rodd Cassandra, Lin Andy, Wei Lai, Lok Anna S
Hepatology Institute, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, 11 South Xizhimen St, Beijing, 100044, China.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Health System, 1150 W Medical Center Drive, 4321 Med Sci I, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):2847-2856. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4206-2. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
Chronic liver disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA and China, but the etiology of liver disease, medical practice, and patient expectations in these two countries are different.
To compare patient knowledge about their liver disease, patient satisfaction with liver disease care, and patient medical decision-making preference in the USA and China.
Three cohorts of established adult patients with liver disease seen in liver clinics in Ann Arbor, USA, and Beijing (urban) and Hebei (rural), China, completed a survey between May and September 2014.
A total of 990 patients (395 USA, 398 Beijing, and 197 Hebei) were analyzed. Mean liver disease knowledge score (maximum 5) in the USA, Beijing, and Hebei patients was 4.1, 3.6, and 3.0, respectively (p < 0.001). US patients had a greater preference for collaborative decision-making: 71.8 % preferred to make treatment decisions together with the doctor, while most Chinese patients (74.6 % Beijing and 84.8 % Hebei) preferred passive decision-making. Mean satisfaction score (maximum 85) in the USA was higher than in Beijing, which in turn was higher than in Hebei (78.2 vs. 66.5 vs. 60.3, p < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between liver disease knowledge score and satisfaction score (r = 0.27, p < 0.001) and with collaborative medical decision-making (r = 0.22, p < 0.001) when responses from all sites were combined.
Liver disease knowledge and patient satisfaction were greatest in the USA, followed by Beijing and then Hebei patients. Understanding these differences and associated factors may help to improve patient outcomes.
慢性肝病是美国和中国发病和死亡的主要原因,但两国肝病的病因、医疗实践及患者期望有所不同。
比较美国和中国患者对自身肝病的了解程度、对肝病护理的满意度以及患者的医疗决策偏好。
2014年5月至9月期间,对美国安阿伯市、中国北京(市区)和河北(农村)肝病诊所的三组成年肝病确诊患者进行了一项调查。
共分析了990例患者(美国395例、北京398例、河北197例)。美国、北京和河北患者的平均肝病知识得分(满分5分)分别为4.1分、3.6分和3.0分(p<0.001)。美国患者更倾向于共同决策:71.8%的患者倾向于与医生共同做出治疗决策,而大多数中国患者(北京为74.6%,河北为84.8%)倾向于被动决策。美国的平均满意度得分(满分85分)高于北京,北京又高于河北(分别为78.2分、66.5分和60.3分,p<0.001)。综合所有地点的回答来看,肝病知识得分与满意度得分之间存在正相关(r = 0.27,p<0.001),与共同医疗决策之间也存在正相关(r = 0.22,p<0.001)。
美国患者的肝病知识和满意度最高,其次是北京患者,然后是河北患者。了解这些差异及相关因素可能有助于改善患者的治疗效果。