• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Market Conditions and Performance in the Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Rating.

作者信息

Kim Ae-Sook

机构信息

Quinnipiac University.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016 Oct;41(5):939-68. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3632221. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-3632221
PMID:27256809
Abstract

Previous studies have documented that market conditions affect nursing home performance; however, the evidence is inconsistent and conflicting. This study introduces three groups of county market conditions and a peer effect variable, and tests their impacts on the Nursing Home Compare (NHC) Five-Star overall rating. Indiana nursing home data and county characteristics are taken mainly from the NHC and Census Bureau websites. The result of the ordered logistic regression analysis indicates that nursing homes in excess demand markets, namely those that are highly concentrated and have fewer nursing homes, tend to perform better than their counterparts in both excess supply and balanced markets. In addition, a peer effect variable, measured as the average overall rating of the competitors, promotes performance improvement. These findings imply that small markets enable consumers to be well informed about a provider's reputation for quality, consequently enhancing performance. Furthermore, not only consumers but also providers seem to seek performance information on the report card to understand their relative position in the market, which thus affects their market strategies and subsequently performance.

摘要

相似文献

1
Market Conditions and Performance in the Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Rating.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016 Oct;41(5):939-68. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3632221. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
2
Nursing home report card and performance gap.疗养院成绩单与绩效差距。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Oct-Dec;41(4):368-77. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000080.
3
Comparing Public Quality Ratings for Accredited and Nonaccredited Nursing Homes.比较经认证和未经认证的疗养院的公共质量评级。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jan;18(1):24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.025. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
4
Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.信息是否重要?竞争、质量与养老院评分报告的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1698-719. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01298.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
5
Market competition and quality of care in the nursing home industry.养老院行业的市场竞争与护理质量
J Health Care Finance. 2005 Fall;32(1):67-81.
6
Ratings game: an analysis of Nursing Home Compare and Yelp ratings.评级游戏:对养老院比较和 Yelp 评级的分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):619-624. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007301. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
Social media ratings of nursing homes associated with experience of care and "Nursing Home Compare" quality measures.与护理体验及“疗养院比较”质量指标相关的疗养院社交媒体评级
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 27;19(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4100-7.
8
Competition in the market for nursing home care.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1988 Summer;13(2):341-60. doi: 10.1215/03616878-13-2-341.
9
The Effects of Chains on the Measurement of Competition in the Nursing Home Industry.连锁经营对养老院行业竞争衡量的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Jun;76(3):315-336. doi: 10.1177/1077558717701771. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
10
Use of resident-origin data to define nursing home market boundaries.利用居民来源数据界定养老院市场边界。
Inquiry. 2002 Spring;39(1):56-66. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_39.1.56.