• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较经认证和未经认证的疗养院的公共质量评级。

Comparing Public Quality Ratings for Accredited and Nonaccredited Nursing Homes.

作者信息

Williams Scott C, Morton David J, Braun Barbara I, Longo Beth Ann, Baker David W

机构信息

The Joint Commission, One Renaissance Blvd, Oakbrook Terrace, IL.

The Joint Commission, One Renaissance Blvd, Oakbrook Terrace, IL.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jan;18(1):24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.025. Epub 2016 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.025
PMID:27600192
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Compare quality ratings of accredited and nonaccredited nursing homes using the publicly available Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Nursing Home Compare data set.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study compared the performance of 711 Joint Commission-accredited (TJC-accredited) nursing homes (81 of which also had Post-Acute Care Certification) to 14,926 non-Joint Commission-accredited (non-TJC-accredited) facilities using the Nursing Home Compare data set (as downloaded on April 2015). Measures included the overall Five-Star Quality Rating and its 4 components (health inspection, quality measures, staffing, and RN staffing), the 18 Nursing Home Compare quality measures (5 short-stay measures, 13 long-stay measures), as well as inspection deficiencies, fines, and payment denials. t tests were used to assess differences in rates for TJC-accredited nursing homes versus non-TJC-accredited nursing homes for quality measures, ratings, and fine amounts. Analysis of variance models were used to determine differences in rates using Joint Commission accreditation status, nursing home size based on number of beds, and ownership type. An additional model with an interaction term using Joint Commission accreditation status and Joint Commission Post-Acute Care Certification status was used to determine differences in rates for Post-Acute Care Certified nursing homes. Binary variables (eg, deficiency type, fines, and payment denials) were evaluated using a logistic regression model with the same covariates.

RESULTS

After controlling for the influences of facility size and ownership type, TJC-accredited nursing homes had significantly higher star ratings than non-TJC-accredited nursing homes on each of the star rating component subscales (P < .05) (but not on the overall star rating), and TJC-accredited nursing homes with Post-Acute Care Certification performed statistically better on the overall star rating, as well as 3 of the 4 subscales (P < .05). TJC-accredited nursing homes had statistically fewer deficiencies than non-TJC-accredited nursing homes (P < .001), were less likely to have immediate jeopardy or widespread deficiencies (P < .001), and had fewer payment denials (P < .001) and lower fines (P < .001).

DISCUSSION

Despite recent changes made to the CMS NHC star-rating methodology, results confirm previous findings that demonstrate a consistent pattern of superior performance among nursing homes accredited by The Joint Commission when compared to non-TJC-accredited facilities across a broad range of indicators in the Nursing Home Compare data set. It is important to note, however, that a cross-sectional study cannot determine causation, so it is unclear if accreditation assists nursing homes in achieving better care, or if higher-performing nursing homes are more likely to pursue accreditation.

CONCLUSIONS

Accreditation status remains a significant predictor of nursing home quality across multiple dimensions, independent of facility size and ownership type.

摘要

目的

使用公开可得的医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)疗养院比较数据集,比较经认可和未经认可的疗养院的质量评级。

方法

这项横断面研究使用疗养院比较数据集(于2015年4月下载),将711家获得联合委员会认可(TJC认可)的疗养院(其中81家还拥有急性后护理认证)与14,926家未获得联合委员会认可(非TJC认可)的机构进行了绩效比较。测量指标包括总体五星级质量评级及其4个组成部分(健康检查、质量指标、人员配备和注册护士人员配备)、18项疗养院比较质量指标(5项短期指标、13项长期指标),以及检查缺陷、罚款和付款拒绝情况。t检验用于评估TJC认可的疗养院与非TJC认可的疗养院在质量指标、评级和罚款金额方面的比率差异。方差分析模型用于确定使用联合委员会认可状态、基于床位数的疗养院规模和所有权类型的比率差异。另一个包含联合委员会认可状态和联合委员会急性后护理认证状态交互项的模型用于确定急性后护理认证疗养院的比率差异。二元变量(如缺陷类型、罚款和付款拒绝)使用具有相同协变量的逻辑回归模型进行评估。

结果

在控制了机构规模和所有权类型的影响后,TJC认可的疗养院在每个星级评级组成部分子量表上的星级评级显著高于非TJC认可的疗养院(P <.05)(但在总体星级评级上没有),并且具有急性后护理认证的TJC认可的疗养院在总体星级评级以及4个子量表中的3个上表现出统计学上的更好成绩(P <.05)。TJC认可的疗养院在统计学上的缺陷比非TJC认可的疗养院少(P <.001),发生立即危险或广泛缺陷的可能性较小(P <.001),付款拒绝较少(P <.001)且罚款较低(P <.001)。

讨论

尽管CMS NHC星级评级方法最近有所变化,但结果证实了先前的发现,即与疗养院比较数据集中广泛指标的非TJC认可设施相比,联合委员会认可的疗养院在绩效方面表现出一致的卓越模式。然而,需要注意的是,横断面研究无法确定因果关系,因此尚不清楚认可是否有助于疗养院实现更好的护理,或者表现较好的疗养院是否更有可能寻求认可。

结论

认可状态仍然是疗养院多个维度质量的重要预测指标,独立于机构规模和所有权类型。

相似文献

1
Comparing Public Quality Ratings for Accredited and Nonaccredited Nursing Homes.比较经认证和未经认证的疗养院的公共质量评级。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jan;18(1):24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.025. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
2
Joint commission accreditation and quality measures in U.S. nursing homes.美国疗养院的联合委员会认证与质量措施
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2012 Feb;13(1):8-16. doi: 10.1177/1527154412443990. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
3
Impact of voluntary accreditation on deficiency citations in U.S. nursing homes.自愿认证对美国养老院缺陷引文的影响。
Gerontologist. 2012 Aug;52(4):561-70. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr136. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
4
Socioeconomic and Geographic Disparities in Accessing Nursing Homes With High Star Ratings.高星级养老院入住机会的社会经济和地理差异。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):852-859.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
5
Nursing home quality: a comparative analysis using CMS Nursing Home Compare data to examine differences between rural and nonrural facilities.养老院质量:利用 CMS 养老院比较数据进行的比较分析,以检查农村和非农村设施之间的差异。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Aug;14(8):593-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
6
Impact of voluntary accreditation on short-stay rehabilitative measures in U.S. nursing homes.自愿认证对美国养老院短期康复措施的影响。
Rehabil Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):167-77. doi: 10.1002/rnj.94. Epub 2013 May 17.
7
A Multistate Comparison Study of COVID-19 Cases Among Accredited and Nonaccredited Nursing Homes.一项关于认证和非认证养老院中 COVID-19 病例的多州比较研究。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2022 Feb;23(1):26-31. doi: 10.1177/15271544211063828. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
8
Nursing Home Compare star ratings before versus after a change in nursing home ownership.查看养老院在所有权变更前后的养老院比较星级评级。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3078-3088. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19104. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
9
Aiming for star performance: the relationship between setting targets and improved nursing home quality of care.追求卓越表现:设定目标与改善养老院护理质量之间的关系。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008 Oct;9(8):594-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.06.008. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
10
Association Between 5-Star Nursing Home Report Card Ratings and Potentially Preventable Hospitalizations.五星级养老院报告卡评级与潜在可预防住院之间的关联
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018787323. doi: 10.1177/0046958018787323.

引用本文的文献

1
Skilled nursing facility staffing shortages: Sources, strategies, and impacts on staff who stayed.熟练护理机构人员短缺:来源、策略及其对留任员工的影响
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59(6):e14355. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14355. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
2
Implementation of US Post-Acute Care Payment Reform and COVID-19 Policies: Examining Experiences of Health System Leaders, Staff, Patients, and Family Caregivers-A Protocol.美国后期医疗保健支付改革和 COVID-19 政策的实施:卫生系统领导者、员工、患者和家庭照顾者经验的研究——方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 23;20(20):6959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206959.
3
Organizational attributes that contribute to the learning & improvement capabilities of healthcare organizations: a scoping review.
有助于医疗保健组织学习和改进能力的组织属性:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09562-w.
4
Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: A systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.卫生和社会保健服务中监管合规的决定因素:使用实施研究综合框架进行的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0278007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278007. eCollection 2023.
5
A Multistate Comparison Study of COVID-19 Cases Among Accredited and Nonaccredited Nursing Homes.一项关于认证和非认证养老院中 COVID-19 病例的多州比较研究。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2022 Feb;23(1):26-31. doi: 10.1177/15271544211063828. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
Determinants of Successful Nursing Home Accreditation.养老院认证成功的决定因素。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211059998. doi: 10.1177/00469580211059998.
7
Referrals of Infection Control Breaches to Public Health Authorities: Ambulatory Care Settings Experience, 2017.向公共卫生当局报告感染控制违规行为:2017年门诊护理机构经验
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Sep;46(9):531-541. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 May 23.