Department of Pharmacy Practice, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Mobile, AL.
Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Jun 15;73(12):873-9. doi: 10.2146/ajhp150482.
The published evidence on pharmacologic approaches to the management of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)-induced angioedema is reviewed.
Angioedema is a serious, potentially life-threatening adverse effect of ACEI use. Although the underlying mechanism is not fully understood, excess bradykinin produced through a complex interplay between the kallikrein-kinin and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems is thought to play a major role. The nonallergic nature of the reaction renders traditional therapies (corticosteroids and antihistamines) ineffective because those agents do not modify the proposed pathophysiology. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) provides kinase II, a protein that breaks down bradykinin. Case reports support FFP as a treatment for ACEI-induced angioedema, but no formal evaluations have been completed to date. Both ecallantide and complement 1 esterase (C1) inhibitor concentrate reduce bradykinin production through upstream inhibition of kallikrein. C1 inhibitor concentrate has been used successfully to manage ACEI-induced angioedema in a few reported cases, but robust supportive studies are lacking. Conversely, ecallantide has been evaluated in multiple randomized trials but has not been shown to offer advantages over traditional therapies. The use of icatibant, a direct antagonist of bradykinin B2 receptors, was reported to be beneficial in several case reports and in a small Phase II study, safely and rapidly reducing symptoms of ACEI-induced angioedema. An ongoing Phase III trial (NCT01919801) will better define the role of icatibant in the management of ACEI-induced angioedema.
FFP, C1 inhibitor, and icatibant appear to be safe and effective therapeutic options for the management of ACEI-induced angioedema, whereas it appears ecallantide should be avoided.
对血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)诱导的血管性水肿的药物治疗方法的已发表证据进行综述。
血管性水肿是 ACEI 应用的一种严重、潜在危及生命的不良反应。尽管其潜在机制尚未完全阐明,但激肽释放酶-激肽系统和肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统之间的复杂相互作用产生的过量缓激肽被认为起主要作用。该反应的非过敏性性质使得传统疗法(皮质类固醇和抗组胺药)无效,因为这些药物不能改变提出的病理生理学。新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)提供激酶 II,一种分解缓激肽的蛋白质。病例报告支持 FFP 作为 ACEI 诱导的血管性水肿的治疗方法,但迄今为止尚未完成任何正式评估。依卡兰肽和补体 1 酯酶(C1)抑制剂浓缩物均通过上游抑制激肽来减少缓激肽的产生。C1 抑制剂浓缩物已成功用于少数报道的 ACEI 诱导的血管性水肿病例的治疗,但缺乏有力的支持性研究。相反,依卡兰肽已在多项随机试验中进行了评估,但并未显示优于传统疗法的优势。几种病例报告和一项小型 II 期研究报告称,使用直接的缓激肽 B2 受体拮抗剂依替巴肽在治疗 ACEI 诱导的血管性水肿方面是有益的,可安全、快速地减轻 ACEI 诱导的血管性水肿的症状。一项正在进行的 III 期试验(NCT01919801)将更好地确定依替巴肽在 ACEI 诱导的血管性水肿管理中的作用。
FFP、C1 抑制剂和依替巴肽似乎是治疗 ACEI 诱导的血管性水肿的安全有效的治疗选择,而依卡兰肽似乎应避免使用。