Zha Wei, Niles David J, Kruger Stanley J, Dardzinski Bernard J, Cadman Robert V, Mummy David G, Nagle Scott K, Fain Sean B
Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI.
Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Acad Radiol. 2016 Sep;23(9):1104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
This study aimed to compare the performance of a semiautomated ventilation defect segmentation approach, adaptive K-means, with manual segmentation of hyperpolarized helium-3 magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).
Six subjects with EIB underwent hyperpolarized helium-3 magnetic resonance imaging and spirometry tests at baseline, post exercise, and recovery over two separate visits. Ventilation defects were analyzed by two methods. First, two independent readers manually segmented ventilation defects. Second, defects were quantified by an adaptive K-means method that corrected for coil sensitivity, applied a vesselness filter to estimate pulmonary vasculature, and segmented defects adaptively based on the overall low-intensity signals in the lungs. These two methods were then compared in four aspects: (1) ventilation defect percent (VDP) measurements, (2) correlation between spirometric measures and measured VDP, (3) regional VDP variations pre- and post exercise challenge, and (4) Dice coefficient for spatial agreement.
The adaptive K-means method was ~5 times faster, and the measured VDP bias was under 2%. The correlation between predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second over forced vital capacity and VDP measured by adaptive K-means (ρ = -0.64, P <0.0001) and by the manual method (ρ = -0.63, P <0.0001) yielded almost identical 95% confidence intervals. Neither method of measuring VDP indicated apical/basal or anterior dependence in this small study cohort.
Compared to the manual method, the adaptive K-means method provided faster, reproducible, comparable measures of VDP in EIB and may be applied to a variety of lung diseases.
本研究旨在比较一种半自动通气缺陷分割方法——自适应K均值算法,与手动分割运动诱发支气管收缩(EIB)受试者的超极化氦-3磁共振成像的性能。
6名EIB受试者在两次单独就诊时,于基线、运动后及恢复阶段接受了超极化氦-3磁共振成像和肺活量测定测试。通过两种方法分析通气缺陷。首先,两名独立的阅片者手动分割通气缺陷。其次,通过自适应K均值方法对缺陷进行量化,该方法校正了线圈灵敏度,应用血管造影滤波器估计肺血管,并根据肺部整体低强度信号自适应地分割缺陷。然后从四个方面比较这两种方法:(1)通气缺陷百分比(VDP)测量;(2)肺活量测定指标与测量的VDP之间的相关性;(3)运动激发前后区域VDP变化;(4)空间一致性的Dice系数。
自适应K均值方法速度快约5倍,测量的VDP偏差在2%以内。通过自适应K均值方法(ρ = -0.64,P <0.0001)和手动方法(ρ = -0.63,P <0.0001)测量的1秒用力呼气量与用力肺活量之比与VDP之间的相关性产生了几乎相同的95%置信区间。在这个小研究队列中,两种测量VDP的方法均未显示出对尖段/基底段或前部的依赖性。
与手动方法相比,自适应K均值方法在EIB中提供了更快、可重复、可比的VDP测量,并且可能适用于多种肺部疾病。