Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa K1H 8L6, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa K1H 8L6, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa K1H 8L6, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa K1H 8L6, Canada.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:86-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
Previous mathematical analyses of diagnostic tests based on the categorization of a continuous measure have found that test sensitivity and specificity varies significantly by disease prevalence. This study determined if the accuracy of diagnostic codes varied by disease prevalence.
We used data from two previous studies in which the true status of renal disease and primary subarachnoid hemorrhage, respectively, had been determined. In multiple stratified random samples from the two previous studies having varying disease prevalence, we measured the accuracy of diagnostic codes for each disease using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value.
Diagnostic code sensitivity and specificity did not change notably within clinically sensible disease prevalence. In contrast, positive and negative predictive values changed significantly with disease prevalence.
Disease prevalence had no important influence on the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic codes in administrative databases.
先前基于连续测量值分类的诊断测试的数学分析发现,疾病流行率显著影响测试的灵敏度和特异性。本研究旨在确定诊断代码的准确性是否随疾病流行率而变化。
我们使用了两项先前研究的数据,这些研究分别确定了真实的肾脏疾病和原发性蛛网膜下腔出血状态。在来自这两项先前研究的多个分层随机样本中,我们根据不同的疾病流行率测量了每个疾病的诊断代码的准确性,使用了灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。
在临床合理的疾病流行率范围内,诊断代码的灵敏度和特异性没有明显变化。相比之下,阳性和阴性预测值随疾病流行率显著变化。
在管理数据库中,疾病流行率对诊断代码的灵敏度和特异性没有重要影响。