Suppr超能文献

在一个城区进行的长期环境 PCDD/Fs 测量的质量浓度和吸入风险的来源分配。

Source apportionment of mass concentration and inhalation risk with long-term ambient PCDD/Fs measurements in an urban area.

机构信息

Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene, National Taiwan University, No.17, Xu-Zhou Rd., Taipei 100, Taiwan.

Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Informatics, Cheng-Shiu University, No.840, Chengqing Rd., Niaosong Dist., Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; Super Micro Mass Research and Technology Center, Cheng-Shiu University, No.840, Chengqing Rd., Niaosong Dist., Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Hazard Mater. 2016 Nov 5;317:180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.059. Epub 2016 May 20.

Abstract

This study applies a receptor model to quantify source contributions to ambient concentration of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and inhalation cancer risk in Taipei from 2003 through 2009. Seventeen PCDD/F congeners were used in the effective variance solution to the Chemical Mass Balance equations to estimate source-specific mass contributions and inhalation risks. The average total PCDD/F concentration was 0.611pg/Nm(3) (0.036pg I-TEQ/Nm(3)). Traffic emissions contributed the most to the PCDD/F concentration (55.7%), followed by waste incinerators (18.6%) and joss stick burning (9.6%). For the inhalation cancer risk, the average was 1.1×10(-6) with traffic, waste incinerators, and joss paper burning as the main contributors (67.3%, 19.4%, and 6.3%, respectively). The mass and risk contributions of waste incinerators decreased significantly from 2003 to 2009 and were higher at downwind sites than at upwind sites. Reducing PCDD/F emissions from traffic and waste incinerators would provide the greatest health benefit. Policies that reduce the uncontrolled burning of joss stick and joss paper also need to be implemented.

摘要

本研究应用受体模型量化了 2003 年至 2009 年台北市大气中二恶英和呋喃(PCDD/Fs)浓度的污染源贡献和吸入性癌症风险。在化学质量平衡方程的有效方差解中使用了 17 种 PCDD/F 同系物,以估计特定源的质量贡献和吸入风险。平均总 PCDD/F 浓度为 0.611pg/Nm³(0.036pg I-TEQ/Nm³)。交通排放对 PCDD/F 浓度的贡献最大(55.7%),其次是垃圾焚烧炉(18.6%)和香烛燃烧(9.6%)。对于吸入性癌症风险,平均为 1.1×10(-6),主要贡献者为交通、垃圾焚烧炉和香烛燃烧(分别为 67.3%、19.4%和 6.3%)。2003 年至 2009 年,垃圾焚烧炉的质量和风险贡献显著下降,下风处的贡献高于上风处。减少交通和垃圾焚烧炉的 PCDD/F 排放将带来最大的健康效益。还需要实施减少香烛和香纸不受控制燃烧的政策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验