Sylvain Chantal, Durand Marie-José, Maillette Pascale, Lamothe Lise
School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Centre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Longueuil Campus, Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles LeMoyne, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jun 7;17:71. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0459-2.
Depression is a major cause of work absenteeism that general practitioners (GPs) face directly since they are responsible for sickness certification and for supervising the return to work (RTW). These activities give GPs a key role in preventing long-term work disability, yet their practices in this regard remain poorly documented. The objectives of this study were therefore to describe GPs' practices with people experiencing work disability due to depressive disorders and explore how GPs' work context may impact on their practices.
We conducted semi-structured individual interviews with 13 GPs and six mental healthcare professionals in two sub-regions of Quebec. The sub-regions differed in terms of availability of specialized resources offering public mental health services. Data were anonymized and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed to identify patterns in the GPs' practices and highlight impacting factors in their work context.
Our results identified a set of practices common to all the GPs and other practices that differentiated them. Two profiles were defined on the basis of the various practices documented. The first is characterized by the integration of the RTW goal into the treatment goal right from sickness certification and by interventions that include the workplace, albeit indirectly. The second is characterized by a lack of early RTW-oriented action and by interventions that include little workplace involvement. Regardless of the practice profile, actions intended to improve collaboration with key stakeholders remain the exception. However, two characteristics of the work context appear to have an impact: the availability of a dedicated mental health nurse and the regular provision of clinical information by psychotherapists. These conditions are rarely present but tend to make a significant difference for the GPs.
Our results highlight the significant role of GPs in the prevention of long-term work disability and their need for support through the organization of mental health services at the primary care level.
抑郁症是导致旷工的主要原因,全科医生(GP)会直接面对这一问题,因为他们负责开具病假证明并监督员工重返工作岗位(RTW)。这些工作使全科医生在预防长期工作残疾方面发挥关键作用,但他们在这方面的做法仍鲜有记录。因此,本研究的目的是描述全科医生对因抑郁症导致工作残疾的患者的治疗方法,并探讨全科医生的工作环境如何影响他们的治疗方法。
我们在魁北克的两个分区对13名全科医生和6名精神卫生保健专业人员进行了半结构化的个人访谈。这两个分区在提供公共心理健康服务的专业资源可用性方面存在差异。数据进行了匿名处理并逐字转录。进行了主题分析,以确定全科医生治疗方法中的模式,并突出其工作环境中的影响因素。
我们的结果确定了所有全科医生共有的一组治疗方法以及使他们有所区别的其他治疗方法。根据记录的各种治疗方法定义了两种类型。第一种类型的特点是从开具病假证明起就将重返工作岗位的目标纳入治疗目标,并采取包括工作场所在内的干预措施,尽管是间接的。第二种类型的特点是缺乏早期以重返工作岗位为导向的行动,且干预措施很少涉及工作场所。无论治疗方法类型如何,旨在改善与关键利益相关者合作的行动仍然是例外情况。然而,工作环境的两个特征似乎有影响:有专门的心理健康护士以及心理治疗师定期提供临床信息。这些条件很少出现,但往往会给全科医生带来显著差异。
我们的结果凸显了全科医生在预防长期工作残疾方面的重要作用,以及他们在初级保健层面通过心理健康服务组织获得支持的必要性。