Suppr超能文献

在退伍军人事务部老年初级保健诊所实施简短焦虑评估与评价。

Implementation of a brief anxiety assessment and evaluation in a Department of Veterans Affairs geriatric primary care clinic.

作者信息

Gould Christine E, Beaudreau Sherry A, Gullickson Gail, Tenover J Lisa, Bauer Elizabeth A, Huh J W Terri

机构信息

Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA;

出版信息

J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(3):335-44. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0258.

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are common and debilitating in older individuals, yet anxiety is often not formally assessed in primary care. We conducted a quality improvement project to examine the feasibility of implementing a brief anxiety assessment, the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI), in a Department of Veterans Affairs geriatric primary care clinic. We compared the GAI with a depression assessment, the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15). Fifty older Veterans (mean = 78.5 +/- 7.4 yr) completed the GAI and GDS-15. Mean completion time and feedback to patients was brief (6.20 min; n = 10). Good internal consistency (alpha = 0.82) was found for GAI scores. Patients with psychiatric diagnoses obtained significantly higher GAI scores (mean = 4.73 +/- 1.15) compared with patients without psychiatric diagnoses (mean = 1.15 +/- 1.86, t(11.46) = -3.10, p = 0.01). Findings suggest that the GAI is acceptable to patients but may not be suitable for differentiating anxiety symptoms or disorders from depression. Interdisciplinary team members continued to implement the GAI after project completion to screen for and track anxiety symptoms in our geriatric primary care patients. Detecting anxiety with the GAI had the benefit of allowing providers to initiate conversations about available treatments and track symptoms as part of noting treatment progress.

摘要

焦虑症在老年人中很常见且使人衰弱,但在初级保健中焦虑症往往未得到正式评估。我们开展了一个质量改进项目,以检验在退伍军人事务部老年初级保健诊所实施一种简短焦虑评估工具——老年焦虑量表(GAI)的可行性。我们将GAI与一种抑郁评估工具——15项老年抑郁量表(GDS - 15)进行了比较。五十名老年退伍军人(平均年龄 = 78.5 ± 7.4岁)完成了GAI和GDS - 15的测评。平均完成时间较短,向患者反馈的时间也很短(6.20分钟;n = 10)。GAI得分具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.82)。与没有精神疾病诊断的患者相比,有精神疾病诊断的患者获得的GAI得分显著更高(平均 = 4.73 ± 1.15)(平均 = 1.15 ± 1.86,t(11.46) = -3.10,p = 0.01)。研究结果表明,GAI患者可以接受,但可能不适合区分焦虑症状或障碍与抑郁。项目完成后,跨学科团队成员继续使用GAI对我们老年初级保健患者进行焦虑症状筛查和跟踪。使用GAI检测焦虑症的好处是,医生可以就可用治疗方法展开讨论,并在记录治疗进展时跟踪症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验