• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PI2®植入物出现不可接受的故障。

Unacceptable failure of the PI2® implant.

作者信息

van Aaken J, Holzer N, Wehrli L, Delaquaize F, Gonzalez I A, Beaulieu J Y

机构信息

1 Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie de l'appareil moteur, Hôpital Universitaire de Genève, Genève, Switzerland.

2 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 Nov;41(9):917-922. doi: 10.1177/1753193416651573. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1177/1753193416651573
PMID:27281160
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The PI2® spacer is designed for treatment of trapeziometacarpal (TM) osteoarthritis. However, the shape of this implant has raised concerns about its stability. We retrospectively investigated 45 implants in 41 patients treated for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in our hospital between 2004 and 2009 who underwent trapeziectomy and insertion of a PI2® spacer. Outcome parameters included revision rates and clinical outcomes correlated with implant position and scaphometacarpal distance, assessed using standard radiographs. A total of 12 implants (27%) were removed at a median time of 10 months (interquartile range (IQR), 7-22 months). These included five dislocations and one early infection. Additionally, a further six patients underwent revision due to persistent pain. Three of these had scapho-trapezoid osteoarthritis, two had developed subluxation of the implant, and one did not show any radiographic abnormalities. A review of patient records revealed that 33 implants remained in place at a median time of 29 months (IQR, 20-57). However, of those, only 21 implants (64%) in 17 patients were available for clinical evaluation at a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR, 19-62 months). No significant differences in clinical outcomes including functional results were observed between in-place ( n = 8) and subluxated ( n = 13) implants. Due to the high revision rate (12/45), consistent with other reports in the literature, we have abandoned the use of the PI2® spacer. We recommend the establishment of a registry for evaluation of future implants.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-series study/level IV.

摘要

未标注

PI2®间隔器设计用于治疗第一掌腕关节(TM)骨关节炎。然而,这种植入物的形状引发了对其稳定性的担忧。我们回顾性研究了2004年至2009年期间在我院接受第一掌腕关节骨关节炎治疗的41例患者中的45枚植入物,这些患者接受了大多角骨切除术并植入了PI2®间隔器。结果参数包括翻修率以及与植入物位置和舟掌距离相关的临床结果,通过标准X线片进行评估。共有12枚植入物(27%)在中位时间10个月(四分位间距(IQR),7 - 22个月)被取出。其中包括5例脱位和1例早期感染。此外,另有6例患者因持续疼痛接受了翻修手术。其中3例患有舟大多角骨关节炎,2例植入物发生半脱位,1例未显示任何影像学异常。对患者记录的审查显示,33枚植入物在中位时间29个月(IQR,20 - 57)时仍在位。然而,在这些患者中,仅17例患者的21枚植入物(64%)可在中位随访29个月(IQR,19 - 62个月)时进行临床评估。在位(n = 8)和半脱位(n = 13)的植入物之间在包括功能结果在内的临床结果方面未观察到显著差异。由于翻修率高(12/45),与文献中的其他报道一致,我们已不再使用PI2®间隔器。我们建议建立一个登记处来评估未来的植入物。

研究类型/证据水平:病例系列研究/IV级。

相似文献

1
Unacceptable failure of the PI2® implant.PI2®植入物出现不可接受的故障。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 Nov;41(9):917-922. doi: 10.1177/1753193416651573. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
2
Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: trapeziectomy versus pyrocarbon interposition implant (Pi2) arthroplasty.拇指腕掌关节骨关节炎:大多角骨切除术与热解碳植入物(Pi2)置换术的比较
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Sep;37(7):617-20. doi: 10.1177/1753193411433176. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
3
A ten-year prospective outcome study of Pi2 pyrocarbon spacer arthroplasty in carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2016 Sep;35(4):255-261. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
4
Comparison between the MAIA Implant and Trapeziectomy for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis: Outcomes at 9 Years' Follow-Up.MAIA 植入物与关节切开术治疗腕掌关节炎的比较:9 年随访结果。
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2021 Jun;26(2):158-165. doi: 10.1142/S2424835521500144.
5
Revision of failed trapeziometacarpal prothesis by CMI pyrocarbon implant: Retrospective study of 28 patients with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years.CMI 热解碳植入物修复失败的腕掌关节假体:28 例患者平均随访 7.5 年的回顾性研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Sep;107(5):102984. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102984. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
6
Pyrocarbon interposition (PyroDisk) implant for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: minimum 5-year follow-up.用于第一掌腕关节骨关节炎的热解碳植入物(PyroDisk):至少5年随访
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Nov;39(11):2150-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
7
[Evaluation of postoperative pain and early functional results in the treatment of carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Comparative prospective study of trapeziectomy vs. MAIA(®) prosthesis in 74 female patients].[掌指关节关节炎治疗中术后疼痛及早期功能结果的评估。74例女性患者中大多角骨切除术与MAIA(®)假体的比较性前瞻性研究]
Chir Main. 2013 Apr;32(2):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.main.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
[Total trapeziectomy and suspension ligamentoplasty: is there any interest to interpose a pyrocarbon Pi2® implant?].[完全大多角骨切除术及悬吊韧带成形术:植入热解碳Pi2®植入物是否有意义?]
Chir Main. 2013 Jun;32(3):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.main.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 13.
9
[Resurfacing prosthesis for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint: 4.5 year follow-up in 83 implants].[大多角骨-第一掌骨关节骨关节炎的表面置换假体:83例植入物的4.5年随访]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 Feb;93(1):46-55. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90203-2.
10
Scaphometacarpal arthroplasty: a report of ten cases of trapeziometacarpal prosthesis and trapeziectomy revision.舟月关节成形术:10 例腕掌关节假体置换和改良性大多角骨切除术的报告。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Jun;45(5):483-487. doi: 10.1177/1753193419900470. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Pyrocardan Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty-Medium-Term Outcomes.热卡丹大多角骨-第一掌腕关节置换术——中期疗效
J Wrist Surg. 2020 Dec;9(6):509-517. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714685. Epub 2020 Aug 21.