May Ulrike
Luzif Amor. 2016;29(57):98-151.
Warda and Strohmayer from Thuringia were among the first German physicians who developed an interest in Freuds theory and therapeutic method around 1900. Their contributions reflect the influence of Otto Binswanger, professor of psychiatry in Jena, a representative of the "psychological direction" in psychiatry which in the beginning was relatively receptive to Freud. The paper discusses their rapprochement to, and detachment from, the Freudian school, including also the work of a third young physician: Ludwig Binswanger, Otto's nephew, who was active in Jena at the same time. It points to certain factors contributing to the increasing rejection Freud met in academic circles which have been underrated to date: (1) the transformation of psychoanalysis into an art of interpretation; (2) the introduction of transference. Both factors which were elaborated by Freud as essentials of his theoretical and practical approach around 1900 and published in 1904/05, undermined the claim of academic medicine to objectivity. The paper describes how psychoanalysis officially abandoned the scientific standards of contemporary medicine at the Weimar congress in 1911, at the same time as Warda and Strohmayer left the Freudian group.
图林根的瓦尔达和施特罗迈尔是最早在1900年左右对弗洛伊德理论和治疗方法产生兴趣的德国医生。他们的贡献反映了耶拿精神病学教授奥托·宾斯万格的影响,奥托是精神病学“心理方向”的代表人物,该学派最初对弗洛伊德相对接纳。本文讨论了他们与弗洛伊德学派的亲近与背离,其中还包括第三位年轻医生路德维希·宾斯万格的工作,路德维希是奥托的侄子,他当时也活跃于耶拿。本文指出了一些导致弗洛伊德在学术界日益遭到排斥的因素,这些因素至今一直被低估:(1)精神分析转变为一种解释艺术;(2)移情的引入。这两个因素在1900年左右由弗洛伊德阐述为其理论和实践方法的核心要点,并于1904/05年发表,它们削弱了学术医学对客观性的主张。本文描述了1911年在魏玛大会上精神分析如何正式摒弃当代医学的科学标准,与此同时瓦尔达和施特罗迈尔也离开了弗洛伊德团体。