Radford Andrew N, Lèbre Laurie, Lecaillon Gilles, Nedelec Sophie L, Simpson Stephen D
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.
Écocéan, 33 rue Chaptal, 34 000, Montpellier, France.
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Oct;22(10):3349-60. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13352. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
Human activities have changed the acoustic environment of many terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems around the globe. Mounting evidence indicates that the resulting anthropogenic noise can impact the behaviour and physiology of at least some species in a range of taxa. However, the majority of experimental studies have considered only immediate responses to single, relatively short-term noise events. Repeated exposure to noise could lead to a heightened or lessened response. Here, we conduct two long-term (12 week), laboratory-based exposure experiments with European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) to examine how an initial impact of different sound types potentially changes over time. Naïve fish showed elevated ventilation rates, indicating heightened stress, in response to impulsive additional noise (playbacks of recordings of pile-driving and seismic surveys), but not to a more continuous additional noise source (playbacks of recordings of ship passes). However, fish exposed to playbacks of pile-driving or seismic noise for 12 weeks no longer responded with an elevated ventilation rate to the same noise type. Fish exposed long-term to playback of pile-driving noise also no longer responded to short-term playback of seismic noise. The lessened response after repeated exposure, likely driven by increased tolerance or a change in hearing threshold, helps explain why fish that experienced 12 weeks of impulsive noise showed no differences in stress, growth or mortality compared to those reared with exposure to ambient-noise playback. Considering how responses to anthropogenic noise change with repeated exposure is important both when assessing likely fitness consequences and the need for mitigation measures.
人类活动已经改变了全球许多陆地和水生生态系统的声学环境。越来越多的证据表明,由此产生的人为噪声会影响一系列分类群中至少某些物种的行为和生理机能。然而,大多数实验研究仅考虑了对单一、相对短期噪声事件的即时反应。反复暴露于噪声可能会导致反应增强或减弱。在此,我们对欧洲海鲈(Dicentrarchus labrax)进行了两项为期12周的基于实验室的长期暴露实验,以研究不同声音类型的初始影响如何随时间潜在变化。初次接触噪声的鱼在面对脉冲附加噪声(打桩和地震勘测录音的回放)时,呼吸频率升高,表明压力增大,但面对更持续的附加噪声源(船只经过录音的回放)时则不然。然而,暴露于打桩或地震噪声回放12周的鱼,对相同噪声类型不再有呼吸频率升高的反应。长期暴露于打桩噪声回放的鱼,对地震噪声的短期回放也不再有反应。反复暴露后反应减弱,可能是由于耐受性增加或听力阈值变化所致,这有助于解释为何经历12周脉冲噪声的鱼与暴露于环境噪声回放下饲养的鱼相比,在压力、生长或死亡率方面没有差异。在评估可能的健康后果和缓解措施的必要性时,考虑对人为噪声的反应如何随反复暴露而变化是很重要的。