Haubensak G
Z Exp Angew Psychol. 1989;36(1):42-56.
In the first of a series of three experiments, two groups of 10 subjects judged either the bottom half or the top half of a series of 16 squares according to their size. After two presentations with the pretraining series, 10 trials with the total series followed. The initial judgments of the pretraining stimuli showed a marked tendency to persist all through the experiment, thus demonstrating a primacy effect. The effect was not completely removed by instructions to modify the judgment scale (Experiment 2). In the third experiment, the number of categories was varied. With a larger number of categories the primacy effect tended to wear off after a few postshift trials. The results are interpreted as providing an alternative explanation of the frequency effect and the number-of-categories effect discovered by Parducci. The present paper considers the frequency effect a special case of the primacy effect. The explanation is based on the fact that ordinarily stimulus frequency and time of first occurrence are confounded.
在由三个实验组成的系列实验的第一个实验中,两组各10名受试者根据大小对一系列16个正方形的下半部分或上半部分进行判断。在对预训练系列进行两次呈现之后,接着对整个系列进行10次试验。预训练刺激的初始判断显示出在整个实验过程中显著的持续倾向,从而证明了首因效应。通过修改判断量表的指示并没有完全消除这种效应(实验2)。在第三个实验中,类别数量有所变化。类别数量较多时,首因效应在几次转换后试验中往往会逐渐消失。这些结果被解释为对帕杜奇发现的频率效应和类别数量效应提供了另一种解释。本文认为频率效应是首因效应的一种特殊情况。这种解释基于这样一个事实,即通常刺激频率和首次出现的时间是混淆的。