Asakawa-Haas Kenji, Schiestl Martina, Bugnyar Thomas, Massen Jorg J M
Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Haidlhof Research Station, University of Vienna and University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Bad Vöslau, Austria.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 10;11(6):e0156962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156962. eCollection 2016.
Although social animals frequently make decisions about when or with whom to cooperate, little is known about the underlying mechanisms of partner choice. Most previous studies compared different dyads' performances, though did not allow an actual choice among partners. We tested eleven ravens, Corvus corax, in triads, giving them first the choice to cooperate with either a highly familiar or a rather unfamiliar partner and, second, with either a friend or a non-friend using a cooperative string-pulling task. In either test, the ravens had a second choice and could cooperate with the other partner, given that this one had not pulled the string in the meantime. We show that during the experiments, these partner ravens indeed learn to wait and inhibit pulling, respectively. Moreover, the results of these two experiments show that ravens' preferences for a specific cooperation partner are not based on familiarity. In contrast, the ravens did show a preference based on relationship quality, as they did choose to cooperate significantly more with friends than with non-friends and they were also more proficient when cooperating with a friend. In order to further identify the proximate mechanism of this preference, we designed an open-choice experiment for the whole group where all birds were free to cooperate on two separate apparatuses. This set-up allowed us to distinguish between preferences for close proximity and preferences to cooperate. The results revealed that friends preferred staying close to each other, but did not necessarily cooperate with one another, suggesting that tolerance of proximity and not relationship quality as a whole may be the driving force behind partner choice in raven cooperation. Consequently, we stress the importance of experiments that allow such titrations and, suggest that these results have important implications for the interpretations of cooperation studies that did not include open partner choice.
尽管群居动物经常要决定何时合作或与谁合作,但对于伙伴选择的潜在机制却知之甚少。此前的大多数研究比较了不同二元组的表现,却没有让动物在伙伴之间进行实际选择。我们用三个一组的方式测试了11只渡鸦(Corvus corax),首先让它们选择与非常熟悉的伙伴还是不太熟悉的伙伴合作,其次让它们选择与朋友还是非朋友合作,采用的是合作拉绳任务。在任何一项测试中,如果另一个伙伴在此期间没有拉绳,渡鸦都有第二次选择,可以与该伙伴合作。我们发现,在实验过程中,这些伙伴渡鸦确实学会了分别等待和抑制拉绳。此外,这两项实验的结果表明,渡鸦对特定合作伙伴的偏好并非基于熟悉程度。相反,渡鸦确实表现出基于关系质量的偏好,因为它们明显更愿意与朋友合作而非非朋友,并且与朋友合作时也更熟练。为了进一步确定这种偏好的近因机制,我们为整个群体设计了一个开放式选择实验,所有的鸟都可以自由地在两个独立的装置上合作。这种设置使我们能够区分对近距离的偏好和合作的偏好。结果显示,朋友之间更喜欢彼此靠近,但不一定会相互合作,这表明对近距离的容忍而非整体的关系质量可能是渡鸦合作中伙伴选择背后的驱动力。因此,我们强调了允许进行此类微调的实验的重要性,并表明这些结果对未包括开放式伙伴选择的合作研究的解释具有重要意义。