Domestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Savoyenstraße 1a, A-1160 Vienna, Austria.
Language Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 22;290(1993):20222189. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2189. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
Humans stand out for their capacity to flexibly cooperate, possibly because they understand their partners' role. Researchers have explored if such understanding is unique to humans by assessing whether non-human species wait to manipulate a cooperative apparatus until a delayed partner arrives. If animals do wait, then it is assumed that they recognize the need for a partner. However, success in these tasks may be the result of social facilitation, while failure may be due to poor inhibitory control. Moreover, this approach does not test if animals take their partners' actions into account. Here we trained dogs to press a button simultaneously with their human partner. Afterwards, we tested them in several conditions to disentangle which elements of their partner's behaviour they take into account. Dogs waited to press the button until the delayed partner arrived, the button was available to the partner and the partner acted (pressed the button). We found no relationship between inhibitory control and success. We conclude that dogs are not merely reacting to the presence of their human partners, but are also taking their actions into account when coordinating with them.
人类之所以能够灵活合作,这可能是因为他们能够理解同伴的角色。研究人员通过评估非人类物种是否会等待延迟的伙伴到达后再操作合作设备,来探索这种理解是否是人类所特有的。如果动物确实会等待,那么可以假设它们认识到了同伴的需求。然而,在这些任务中取得成功可能是社交促进的结果,而失败可能是由于抑制控制能力差。此外,这种方法并不能测试动物是否考虑到了它们同伴的行为。在这里,我们训练狗与它们的人类伙伴同时按下一个按钮。之后,我们在几种情况下对它们进行测试,以区分它们考虑到了其同伴行为的哪些方面。狗会等待,直到延迟的伙伴到达,按钮对伙伴可用,并且伙伴采取了行动(按下了按钮)。我们发现抑制控制能力与成功之间没有关系。我们的结论是,狗不仅仅是对人类伙伴的存在做出反应,而且在与它们协调时还会考虑到它们的行为。