• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨甲环酸与ε-氨基己酸在全膝关节置换术中的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。

Tranexamic Acid versus Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Trauma Center, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng 475000, China.

Department of Trauma Orthopedics, Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, No. 41 Longtou Road, Zaozhuang City, Shandong Province, China.

出版信息

J Healthc Eng. 2021 Nov 3;2021:1758066. doi: 10.1155/2021/1758066. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/1758066
PMID:34777729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8580677/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

At present, the effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the differences between the effects of TXA and EACA in TKA.

METHODS

We used electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Ovid, ScienceDirect, Cochran Library, Google Scholar, clinical trial, and Chinese related databases, for literature search to find any effect of TXA and EACA in TKA. The differences between groups were compared by odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of four studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 1 cohort study, were involved in this meta-analysis, involving 1836 participants. Among these participants, 816 belonged to the TXA group and 1020 belonged to the EACA group.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis indicated no difference in surgery time (WMD = 0.01, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.36), total amount of blood loss (WMD = 0.14, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.37), transfusion rate (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.78), transfusion units per patient (SMD = -0.15, 95% CI -0.54 to 0.25), complications (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.55), and length of stay (SMD = -0.01, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the effect of TXA is not superior to EACA in TKA. However, this conclusion still needs to be further confirmed by multicenter and large-sample clinical trials.

摘要

目的

目前,氨甲环酸(TXA)和氨基己酸(EACA)对全膝关节置换术(TKA)的影响仍存在争议。因此,本荟萃分析的目的是比较 TXA 和 EACA 在 TKA 中的效果差异。

方法

我们使用电子数据库,包括 PubMed、Embase、MEDLINE、Ovid、ScienceDirect、Cochrane 图书馆、Google Scholar、临床试验和中文相关数据库,进行文献检索,以寻找 TXA 和 EACA 在 TKA 中的任何效果。通过优势比(OR)、加权均数差(WMD)和 95%置信区间(CI)比较组间差异。共有四项研究,包括三项随机对照试验(RCT)和一项队列研究,纳入本荟萃分析,共涉及 1836 名参与者。其中,816 名参与者属于 TXA 组,1020 名参与者属于 EACA 组。

结果

荟萃分析表明手术时间(WMD=0.01,95%CI-0.35 至 0.36)、总失血量(WMD=0.14,95%CI-0.09 至 0.37)、输血率(OR=0.74,95%CI0.20 至 2.78)、每位患者输血单位数(SMD=-0.15,95%CI-0.54 至 0.25)、并发症(OR=0.75,95%CI0.37 至 1.55)和住院时间(SMD=-0.01,95%CI-0.11 至 0.08)无差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,TXA 的效果并不优于 EACA 在 TKA 中。然而,这一结论仍需要通过多中心、大样本临床试验进一步证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/4f0eb97c6880/JHE2021-1758066.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/e0b831e9741e/JHE2021-1758066.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/7459cfa41136/JHE2021-1758066.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/9d7d60e56263/JHE2021-1758066.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/994feb8c2b4c/JHE2021-1758066.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/cb31e5b001b1/JHE2021-1758066.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/5e9a630ff65c/JHE2021-1758066.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/5f06f36e7e00/JHE2021-1758066.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/4f0eb97c6880/JHE2021-1758066.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/e0b831e9741e/JHE2021-1758066.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/7459cfa41136/JHE2021-1758066.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/9d7d60e56263/JHE2021-1758066.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/994feb8c2b4c/JHE2021-1758066.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/cb31e5b001b1/JHE2021-1758066.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/5e9a630ff65c/JHE2021-1758066.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/5f06f36e7e00/JHE2021-1758066.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4479/8580677/4f0eb97c6880/JHE2021-1758066.008.jpg

相似文献

1
Tranexamic Acid versus Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.氨甲环酸与ε-氨基己酸在全膝关节置换术中的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Nov 3;2021:1758066. doi: 10.1155/2021/1758066. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of efficacy between tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid for total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.氨甲环酸与ε-氨基己酸治疗全膝关节置换术疗效比较的Meta 分析:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Nov 24;102(47):e33876. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033876.
3
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid versus tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis study.氨甲环酸与氨甲环酸在全膝关节置换术中的应用:荟萃分析研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2019 Jul 18;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0534-2.
4
Tranexamic acid or epsilon-aminocaproic acid in total joint arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial.氨甲环酸或 ε-氨基己酸用于全关节置换术?一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1093-1099. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1096.R1.
5
Comparing ε-Aminocaproic Acid and Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Postoperative Transfusions in Total Knee Arthroplasty.比较ε-氨基己酸和氨甲环酸在减少全膝关节置换术后输血中的作用
J Knee Surg. 2017 Jun;30(5):460-466. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593362. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
6
Comparison between epsilon-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid for total hip and knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.ε-氨基己酸与氨甲环酸在全髋关节和膝关节置换术中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Sep-Dec;28(3):2309499020959158. doi: 10.1177/2309499020959158.
7
Combination of Intravenous and Intra-Articular Application of Tranexamic Acid and Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.静脉和关节内联合应用氨甲环酸和ε-氨基己酸在初次全膝关节置换术中的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):687-694. doi: 10.1111/os.13638. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
8
The Optimal Dose, Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid and Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid to Reduce Bleeding in TKA: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.氨甲环酸和ε-氨基己酸在 TKA 中减少出血的最佳剂量、疗效和安全性:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr;15(4):930-946. doi: 10.1111/os.13678. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
9
Blood Conservation Using Tranexamic Acid Is Not Superior to Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid After Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后使用氨甲环酸进行血液保护并不优于氨基己酸。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 4;99(19):1621-1628. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00738.
10
Tranexamic acid versus aminocaproic acid for blood management after total knee and total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.氨甲环酸与氨基己酸在全膝关节和全髋关节置换术后血液管理中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.042. Epub 2018 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Retracted: Tranexamic Acid versus Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.撤回:全膝关节置换术中氨甲环酸与6-氨基己酸的Meta分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2023 Nov 1;2023:9894509. doi: 10.1155/2023/9894509. eCollection 2023.
2
The Optimal Dose, Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid and Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid to Reduce Bleeding in TKA: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.氨甲环酸和ε-氨基己酸在 TKA 中减少出血的最佳剂量、疗效和安全性:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr;15(4):930-946. doi: 10.1111/os.13678. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Tranexamic acid or epsilon-aminocaproic acid in total joint arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial.氨甲环酸或 ε-氨基己酸用于全关节置换术?一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1093-1099. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1096.R1.
2
In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance.在 Cochrane 综述中,分配隐藏的偏倚风险评估经常不符合 Cochrane 手册指南。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;106:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
3
Blood Conservation Using Tranexamic Acid Is Not Superior to Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
全膝关节置换术后使用氨甲环酸进行血液保护并不优于氨基己酸。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 4;99(19):1621-1628. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00738.
4
Projected increase in total knee arthroplasty in the United States - an alternative projection model.预计美国全膝关节置换术的增长——一种替代的预测模型。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Nov;25(11):1797-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
5
Comparative effectiveness of epsilon-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid on postoperative bleeding following cardiac surgery during a national medication shortage.在全国性药物短缺期间,ε-氨基己酸和氨甲环酸对心脏手术后出血的比较疗效
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:516-523. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.037. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
6
Comparing ε-Aminocaproic Acid and Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Postoperative Transfusions in Total Knee Arthroplasty.比较ε-氨基己酸和氨甲环酸在减少全膝关节置换术后输血中的作用
J Knee Surg. 2017 Jun;30(5):460-466. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593362. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
7
Comparison of ε-Aminocaproic Acid and Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Postoperative Transfusions in Total Hip Arthroplasty.ε-氨基己酸与氨甲环酸在减少全髋关节置换术后输血方面的比较
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2795-2799.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
Pain after total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review focusing on the stratification of patients at risk for persistent pain.全膝关节置换术后疼痛:一篇聚焦于持续性疼痛风险患者分层的叙述性综述
Bone Joint J. 2015 Oct;97-B(10 Suppl A):45-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.36524.
9
Predicting Blood Loss in Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.预测全膝关节和髋关节置换术中的失血量。
Orthop Clin North Am. 2015 Oct;46(4):445-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
10
Reduced Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates: Additional Benefits of Local Infiltration Anaesthesia in Knee Arthroplasty Patients.减少失血和输血率:局部浸润麻醉在膝关节置换术患者中的额外益处
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Nov;30(11):2034-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.025. Epub 2015 May 19.