• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于学校的多成分吸烟预防干预措施的中介因素:LdP整群随机对照试验

Mediating factors of a school-based multi-component smoking prevention intervention: the LdP cluster randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Carreras G, Bosi S, Angelini P, Gorini G

机构信息

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, 50139, Italy

Lega Italiana per la Lotta contro i Tumori (LILT), Reggio Emilia, 42123, Italy.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2016 Aug;31(4):439-49. doi: 10.1093/her/cyw031. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1093/her/cyw031
PMID:27288347
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate factors mediating the effects of Luoghi di Prevenzione (LdP) smoking prevention intervention based on social competence and social influence approaches, and characterized by peer-led school-based interventions, out-of-school workshops, school lessons, and by enforcing the school anti-smoking policy. Students aged 14-15 years in 13 secondary schools in Reggio Emilia, Italy (989 students) were randomly assigned to the LdP intervention or a control condition. The baseline and follow-up surveys were carried out before and 18 months after the intervention, respectively.The outcomes were cigarette daily and frequent smoking and smoking at school. Multilevel multiple mediation analyses were carried out in order to study effect mediation. The mediators were normative perception, positive and negative beliefs, refusal skills for smoking, social acceptability perception, risk perception, smoking knowledge and awareness about dangers of second-hand smoking.The intervention effects were explained by the social influence component through the mediator refusal skills for smoking. The programme also showed to significantly increase risk perception and smoking knowledge, even though these mediators had no effect on smoking. Moreover, LdP intervention directly reduced smoking in school areas. Future interventions should maintain and strengthen the LdP social influence component and the part regarding the school anti-smoking policy.

摘要

本研究旨在调查基于社会能力和社会影响方法的洛吉迪预防(LdP)吸烟预防干预效果的中介因素。该干预以同伴主导的校内干预、校外工作坊、学校课程为特色,并强化学校的反吸烟政策。意大利雷焦艾米利亚13所中学的14 - 15岁学生(989名)被随机分配到LdP干预组或对照组。基线调查和随访调查分别在干预前和干预后18个月进行。结果指标为每日吸烟和频繁吸烟情况以及在学校吸烟的情况。为研究效果中介进行了多层次多重中介分析。中介因素包括规范认知、积极和消极信念、吸烟拒绝技巧、社会可接受性认知、风险认知、吸烟知识以及对二手烟危害的认识。干预效果通过社会影响成分经由吸烟拒绝技巧这一中介因素得以解释。该项目还显示能显著提高风险认知和吸烟知识,尽管这些中介因素对吸烟行为没有影响。此外,LdP干预直接减少了校园区域内的吸烟行为。未来的干预措施应维持并强化LdP的社会影响成分以及与学校反吸烟政策相关的部分。

相似文献

1
Mediating factors of a school-based multi-component smoking prevention intervention: the LdP cluster randomized controlled trial.一项基于学校的多成分吸烟预防干预措施的中介因素:LdP整群随机对照试验
Health Educ Res. 2016 Aug;31(4):439-49. doi: 10.1093/her/cyw031. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
2
Effectiveness of a school-based multi-component smoking prevention intervention: the LdP cluster randomized controlled trial.一项基于学校的多成分吸烟预防干预措施的效果:LdP整群随机对照试验
Prev Med. 2014 Apr;61:6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
3
A school-based peer-led smoking prevention intervention with extracurricular activities: the LILT-LdP cluster randomized controlled trial design and study population.一项以学校为基础、同伴主导并伴有课外活动的吸烟预防干预措施:LILT-LdP整群随机对照试验设计与研究人群
Tumori. 2013 Sep-Oct;99(5):572-7. doi: 10.1177/030089161309900502.
4
The Role of Substance-Specific Skills and Cognitions in the Effectiveness of a School-Based Prevention Program on Smoking Incidence.特定物质技能和认知在一项基于学校的吸烟发生率预防计划效果中的作用。
Eval Health Prof. 2016 Sep;39(3):336-55. doi: 10.1177/0163278715588825. Epub 2015 May 29.
5
Implementation of a peer-led school based smoking prevention programme: a mixed methods process evaluation.实施基于同伴领导的学校预防吸烟计划:混合方法的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):742. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7112-7.
6
Effect of a peer-led prevention program (P2P) on smoking in vocational high school students: Results from a two-school-year cluster-randomized trial.同伴主导的预防项目(P2P)对职业高中学生吸烟的影响:一项为期两个学年的整群随机试验结果
Addiction. 2024 Sep;119(9):1616-1628. doi: 10.1111/add.16528. Epub 2024 May 23.
7
Short-term mediating factors of a school-based intervention to prevent youth substance use in Europe.欧洲一项预防青少年药物使用的校本干预措施的短期中介因素
J Adolesc Health. 2014 May;54(5):565-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
8
Rationale, design and conduct of a school-based anti-smoking intervention: the "PEPITES" cluster randomized trial.基于学校的戒烟干预:“PEPITES”群组随机试验的原理、设计与实施。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 31;18(1):942. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5840-8.
9
"GiochiAMO": a school-based smoking and alcohol prevention program for children - a pilot randomized field trial. Part 2.“GiochiAMO”:一项针对儿童的校内吸烟与酗酒预防项目——一项随机现场试验试点。第二部分。
Ann Ig. 2018 Jul-Aug;30(4):273-284. doi: 10.7416/ai.2018.2219.
10
The Effectiveness of Smoking Prevention Module Towards Knowledge and Smoking Refusal Skills among Adolescents in Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.马来西亚吉兰丹州哥打巴鲁市青少年吸烟预防模块对知识及吸烟拒绝技巧的有效性
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):3353-3359. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3353.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence and Gap Map of Whole-School Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Risk Behaviours in Adolescence: Programme Component Mapping Within the Health-Promoting Schools Framework: An evidence and gap map.促进青少年心理健康和预防风险行为的全学校干预措施的证据与差距图:健康促进学校框架内的计划组成部分映射:一份证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 10;21(1):e70024. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70024. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Whole-school Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Risk Behaviours in Adolescence.促进青少年心理健康和预防风险行为的全校干预措施有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Feb;54(2):271-289. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02135-6. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
Understanding the mechanisms of change in social norms around tobacco use: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions.理解烟草使用社会规范的变化机制:干预措施的系统评价与荟萃分析
Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):215-235. doi: 10.1111/add.16685. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
4
MECHANISMS Study: Using Game Theory to Assess the Effects of Social Norms and Social Networks on Adolescent Smoking in Schools-Study Protocol.机制研究:使用博弈论评估学校中社会规范和社交网络对青少年吸烟的影响 - 研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 4;8:377. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00377. eCollection 2020.
5
The Effectiveness of Smoking Prevention Module Towards Knowledge and Smoking Refusal Skills among Adolescents in Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.马来西亚吉兰丹州哥打巴鲁市青少年吸烟预防模块对知识及吸烟拒绝技巧的有效性
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):3353-3359. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3353.