• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

莲花瓣膜系统治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄且手术风险中等患者的疗效与安全性:北欧莲花经导管主动脉瓣置换术注册研究结果

Efficacy and safety of the Lotus Valve System for treatment of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and intermediate surgical risk: Results from the Nordic Lotus-TAVR registry.

作者信息

De Backer Ole, Götberg Matthias, Ihlberg Leo, Packer Erik, Savontaus Mikko, Nielsen Niels E, Jørgensen Troels H, Nykänen Antti, Baranowski Jacek, Niemelä Matti, Eskola Markku, Bjursten Henrik, Søndergaard Lars

机构信息

The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 15;219:92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.072. Epub 2016 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.072
PMID:27288972
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an established therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic, severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) who are ineligible or at high risk for conventional valvular surgery. In Northwestern Europe, the TAVR technology is also increasingly used to treat patients with an intermediate risk profile.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study was designed as an independent Nordic multicenter registry of intermediate risk patients treated with the Lotus Valve System (Boston Scientific, MA, USA; N=154). Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-defined device success was obtained in 97.4%. A Lotus Valve was successfully implanted in all patients. There was no valve migration, embolization, ectopic valve deployment, or TAV-in-TAV deployment. The VARC-defined combined safety rate at 30days was 92.2%, with a mortality rate of 1.9% and stroke rate of 3.2%. The clinical efficacy rate after 30days was 91.6% - only one patient had moderate aortic regurgitation. When considering only those patients in the late experience group (N=79), the combined safety and clinical efficacy rates were 93.7% and 92.4%, respectively. The pacemaker implantation rate was 27.9% - this rate was 12.8% in case of a combined implantation depth <4mm and a device/annulus ratio<1.05.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of the repositionable, retrievable Lotus Valve System in intermediate risk patients with AS. The VARC-defined device success rate was 97.4% with a 30-day patient safety and clinical efficacy rate of more than 90%. Less than moderate aortic regurgitation was obtained in 99.4% of patients.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已成为有症状的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的既定治疗选择,这些患者不符合传统瓣膜手术的条件或处于高风险。在欧洲西北部,TAVR技术也越来越多地用于治疗具有中度风险特征的患者。

方法与结果

本研究设计为一项独立的北欧多中心注册研究,纳入使用Lotus瓣膜系统(美国马萨诸塞州波士顿科学公司;N = 154)治疗的中度风险患者。瓣膜学术研究联盟(VARC)定义的器械成功率为97.4%。所有患者均成功植入了Lotus瓣膜。未发生瓣膜移位、栓塞、异位瓣膜植入或TAV-in-TAV植入。30天时VARC定义的综合安全率为92.2%,死亡率为1.9%,卒中率为3.2%。30天后的临床有效率为91.6%——只有1例患者有中度主动脉瓣反流。仅考虑晚期经验组的患者(N = 79)时,综合安全率和临床有效率分别为93.7%和92.4%。起搏器植入率为27.9%——在联合植入深度<4mm且器械/瓣环比<1.05的情况下,该率为12.8%。

结论

本研究证明了可重新定位、可回收的Lotus瓣膜系统在中度风险AS患者中的有效性和安全性。VARC定义的器械成功率为97.4%,30天患者安全率和临床有效率超过90%。99.4%的患者获得了小于中度的主动脉瓣反流。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of the Lotus Valve System for treatment of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and intermediate surgical risk: Results from the Nordic Lotus-TAVR registry.莲花瓣膜系统治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄且手术风险中等患者的疗效与安全性:北欧莲花经导管主动脉瓣置换术注册研究结果
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 15;219:92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.072. Epub 2016 May 31.
2
Procedural and 30-day clinical outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with lotus valve: Results of the RELEVANT study.经导管植入莲花瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术后的操作及30天临床结果:相关研究结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1;90(7):1206-1211. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26914. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
3
Use of a Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Aortic Valve in Routine Clinical Practice: The RESPOND Study and RESPOND Extension Cohort.在常规临床实践中使用可重定位和完全可回收的主动脉瓣:RESPOND 研究和 RESPOND 扩展队列。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 14;12(1):38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.052.
4
A comparison of the fully repositionable and retrievable Boston Lotus and direct flow medical valves for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: A single center experience.用于治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的完全可重新定位和可回收的波士顿莲花瓣膜与直流通医疗瓣膜的比较:单中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 1;91(5):966-974. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27319. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
5
1-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Results of the REPRISE II Study.120例严重主动脉瓣狭窄高危手术患者使用可完全重新定位和回收的Lotus经导管主动脉瓣置换瓣膜的1年结局:REPRISE II研究结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 22;9(4):376-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.024.
6
Initial Single-Center Experience With the Fully Repositionable Transfemoral Lotus Aortic Valve System.完全可重新定位经股动脉Lotus主动脉瓣系统的单中心初步经验
J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 Jan;29(1):30-35. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis using a repositionable valve system: 30-day primary endpoint results from the REPRISE II study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的可重定位瓣膜系统:REPRISE II 研究的 30 天主要终点结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 30;64(13):1339-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.067.
8
Outcome With the Repositionable and Retrievable Boston Scientific Lotus Valve Compared With the Balloon-Expandable Edwards Sapien 3 Valve in Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement.可重定位和可回收 Boston Scientific Lotus 瓣膜与经股主动脉瓣置换术患者中球囊扩张型 Edwards Sapien 3 瓣膜的结局比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004670.
9
Low permanent pacemaker rates following Lotus device implantation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement due to modified implantation protocol.由于改良植入方案,经导管主动脉瓣置换术采用Lotus装置植入后永久性起搏器植入率较低。
Cardiol J. 2017;24(3):250-258. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0024. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
10
Safety and efficacy of valve repositioning during transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Lotus Valve System.使用Lotus瓣膜系统经导管主动脉瓣置换术中瓣膜重新定位的安全性和有效性。
J Cardiol. 2017 Jul;70(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
From an Unfolding Emergency Treatment to a Universal Shift in Therapy: The History and Evolution of the Catheter-Based Treatment of Aortic Valve Stenosis.从一种正在展开的紧急治疗到治疗方法的全面转变:基于导管的主动脉瓣狭窄治疗的历史与演变
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 17;23(10):349. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2310349. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Pre-dilation and Post-dilation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Indications, Benefits and Risks.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的预扩张和后扩张:适应症、益处和风险
Interv Cardiol. 2021 Oct 12;16:e28. doi: 10.15420/icr.2020.35. eCollection 2021 Apr.
3
The Lotus Valve System: an In-depth Review of the Technology.
《莲花瓣式人造心脏瓣膜系统:技术深度评估》
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Nov 25;21(12):157. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1234-5.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in atypical valve anatomy using the Lotus valve : A Chinese single-center experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗非典型主动脉瓣解剖结构的 Lotus 瓣膜:中国单中心经验。
Herz. 2021 Feb;46(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s00059-018-4778-z. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
5
The Lotus dilemma-respond to paravalvular leakage, but not answering pacemaker implantations?莲花困境——应对瓣周漏,但不涉及起搏器植入?
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Sep;9(9):2804-2807. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.64.
6
How TAVI registries report clinical outcomes-A systematic review of endpoints based on VARC-2 definitions.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)注册研究如何报告临床结局——基于VARC-2定义的终点系统评价
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0180815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180815. eCollection 2017.