Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, United States.
BioTechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, United States.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 1;566-567:949-959. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.073. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
Agricultural management practices can produce changes in soil microbial populations whose functions are crucial to crop production and may be detectable using high-throughput sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA. To apply sequencing-derived bacterial community structure data to on-farm decision-making will require a better understanding of the complex associations between soil microbial community structure and soil function. Here 16S rRNA sequencing was used to profile soil bacterial communities following application of cover crops and organic fertilizer treatments in certified organic field cropping systems. Amendment treatments were hairy vetch (Vicia villosa), winter rye (Secale cereale), oilseed radish (Raphanus sativus), buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum), beef manure, pelleted poultry manure, Sustane(®) 8-2-4, and a no-amendment control. Enzyme activities, net N mineralization, soil respiration, and soil physicochemical properties including nutrient levels, organic matter (OM) and pH were measured. Relationships between these functional and physicochemical parameters and soil bacterial community structure were assessed using multivariate methods including redundancy analysis, discriminant analysis, and Bayesian inference. Several cover crops and fertilizers affected soil functions including N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase and β-glucosidase activity. Effects, however, were not consistent across locations and sampling timepoints. Correlations were observed among functional parameters and relative abundances of individual bacterial families and phyla. Bayesian analysis inferred no directional relationships between functional activities, bacterial families, and physicochemical parameters. Soil functional profiles were more strongly predicted by location than by treatment, and differences were largely explained by soil physicochemical parameters. Composition of soil bacterial communities was predictive of soil functional profiles. Differences in soil function were better explained using both soil physicochemical test values and bacterial community structure data than using soil tests alone. Pursuing a better understanding of bacterial community composition and how it is affected by farming practices is a promising avenue for increasing our ability to predict the impact of management practices on important soil functions.
农业管理措施会改变土壤微生物种群,这些种群的功能对作物生产至关重要,可以通过高通量测序细菌 16S rRNA 来检测。为了将测序衍生的细菌群落结构数据应用于农场决策,需要更好地理解土壤微生物群落结构与土壤功能之间的复杂关联。在这里,在经过认证的有机田间作物系统中,应用覆盖作物和有机肥处理后,使用 16S rRNA 测序来描述土壤细菌群落。改良处理包括毛野豌豆(Vicia villosa)、冬黑麦(Secale cereale)、油萝卜(Raphanus sativus)、荞麦(Fagopyrum esculentum)、牛肉粪肥、颗粒状家禽粪肥、Sustane(®)8-2-4 和无改良对照。测量了酶活性、净氮矿化、土壤呼吸以及包括养分水平、有机质(OM)和 pH 在内的土壤物理化学特性。使用包括冗余分析、判别分析和贝叶斯推断在内的多元方法评估了这些功能和物理化学参数与土壤细菌群落结构之间的关系。几种覆盖作物和肥料影响了土壤功能,包括 N-乙酰-β-d-氨基葡萄糖苷酶和β-葡萄糖苷酶活性。然而,这些影响在不同的地点和采样时间点并不一致。在功能参数和个别细菌科和菌门的相对丰度之间观察到相关性。贝叶斯分析推断出功能活性、细菌科和物理化学参数之间没有直接关系。土壤功能谱受位置的影响大于处理的影响,差异主要由土壤物理化学参数解释。土壤细菌群落的组成可预测土壤功能谱。使用土壤物理化学测试值和细菌群落结构数据比仅使用土壤测试能更好地解释土壤功能的差异。更好地理解细菌群落组成及其如何受到耕作实践的影响,是提高我们预测管理实践对重要土壤功能影响的能力的一个有希望的途径。