Wray T B, Braciszewski J M, Zywiak W H, Stout R L
Center for Alcohol and Addictions Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI.
Decision Sciences Institute, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Pawtucket, RI.
J Subst Use. 2016;21(3):294-297. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2015.1018974. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
Research on the course of substance use disorders (SUDs) faces challenges in assessing behavior over lengthy time periods. Calendar-based methods, like the Timeline Followback (TLFB), may overcome these challenges. This study assessed the reliability of self-reported weekly alcohol use, drug use, and HIV-risk behaviors over the past 90 days using an interview TLFB. Individuals with SUD in outpatient treatment (N = 26) completed the TLFB at baseline and then a week later with separate interviewers. Weekly ratings were aggregated across 4 week intervals for each administration. Intra-class correlations were used to compare agreement between the two administrations. Reliabilities for alcohol and drug use ratings ranged from good to excellent for most drug categories (ICCs = 0.76 - 1.00), except opioid use (other than heroin) and sedative use produced sub-standard reliabilities (ICCs = 0.29 - 0.74). HIV-risk behavior reliabilities also ranged from good to excellent (ICCs = 0.70 - 0.97), but were substandard for the number of casual sex partners for some intervals (ICCs = 0.29, 0.63). Findings extend support for the use of TLFB to produce reliable assessments of many drugs and HIV-risk behaviors across longitudinal intervals.
物质使用障碍(SUDs)病程的研究在评估长时间的行为方面面临挑战。基于日历的方法,如时间线追溯法(TLFB),可能会克服这些挑战。本研究使用访谈式TLFB评估了过去90天内自我报告的每周饮酒、吸毒及HIV风险行为的可靠性。门诊治疗中的SUD个体(N = 26)在基线时完成TLFB,然后在一周后由不同的访谈者再次进行。每次评估时,每周评分按4周间隔进行汇总。组内相关系数用于比较两次评估之间的一致性。除阿片类药物(海洛因除外)使用和镇静剂使用的可靠性低于标准(组内相关系数= 0.29 - 0.74)外,大多数药物类别的酒精和药物使用评分的可靠性从良好到优秀不等(组内相关系数= 0.76 - 1.00)。HIV风险行为的可靠性也从良好到优秀(组内相关系数= 0.70 - 0.97),但在某些时间段内随意性伴侣数量的可靠性低于标准(组内相关系数= 0.29, 0.63)。研究结果进一步支持使用TLFB对多种药物和HIV风险行为进行纵向可靠评估。