Midanik L T, Hines A M, Barrett D C, Paul J P, Crosby G M, Stall R D
School of Social Welfare, University of California at Berkeley, 94720-7400, USA.
J Stud Alcohol. 1998 Nov;59(6):681-9. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.681.
The purpose of this study is to compare reports of alcohol use, drug use and sexual behavior from 30-day Summary measures with an expanded version of a Timeline Follow-back (Timeline) interview technique among gay/bisexual men entering outpatient substance abuse treatment at a gay-identified agency.
Respondents (N = 418) first completed self-administered questionnaires covering the 30-day period prior to their last use of alcohol or drugs. Summary measures included alcohol use, number of days of use for five categories of drugs and number of episodes of anal intercourse (with and without condoms) by partner type (primary or secondary). Participants then completed the Timeline interview procedure to recall their daily drinking, drug use and sexual behavior during the same 30-day period.
The findings indicate that the Timeline method yielded significantly lower estimates of mean number of drinks consumed when heavier than usual drinking days is included in the Summary measure (124.0 vs 147.0 drinks), mean number of days drugs were used (9.3 vs 10.7) and mean number of episodes of anal intercourse with a primary partner (1.2 vs 2.2). Differences generally remained significant when assessed by length of time between the study interview and last use of alcohol or drugs, with the exception of number of anal sex episodes with primary partners.
These findings indicate that Timeline estimates are lower than estimates using a more standard method (Summary measures). Discrepancies between these findings and those reported by other researchers indicate a need for further exploration of the effects of the mode of administration on various populations.
本研究旨在比较在一家同性恋者专用机构接受门诊药物滥用治疗的男同性恋者/双性恋男性中,使用30天总结测量法与扩展版时间线追溯(Timeline)访谈技术所得到的酒精使用、药物使用及性行为报告。
受访者(N = 418)首先完成自我管理问卷,内容涵盖其上次使用酒精或药物之前的30天。总结测量包括酒精使用情况、五类药物的使用天数以及按伴侣类型(主要或次要)划分的肛交次数(使用和未使用避孕套)。参与者随后完成时间线访谈程序,以回忆同一30天期间他们的日常饮酒、药物使用及性行为情况。
研究结果表明,当总结测量中纳入比平常饮酒量更大的天数时,时间线方法得出的平均饮酒量估计值显著更低(124.0杯对147.0杯)、药物使用天数的平均估计值更低(9.3天对10.7天)以及与主要伴侣肛交次数的平均估计值更低(1.2次对2.2次)。除与主要伴侣的肛交次数外,在根据研究访谈与上次使用酒精或药物之间的时间长度进行评估时,差异通常仍具有显著性。
这些研究结果表明,时间线估计值低于使用更标准方法(总结测量)得出的估计值。这些研究结果与其他研究人员报告的结果之间的差异表明,需要进一步探索管理方式对不同人群的影响。