Larcombe S D, Tregaskes C A, Coffey J, Stevenson A E, Alexander L G, Arnold K E
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
WALTHAM® Centre for Pet Nutrition, Waltham-on-the-Wolds, Leicestershire LE14 4RT, UK.
Conserv Physiol. 2015 Oct 20;3(1):cov045. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cov045. eCollection 2015.
Many parrot species are kept in captivity for conservation, but often show poor reproduction, health and survival. These traits are known to be influenced by oxidative stress, the imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ability of antioxidant defences to ameliorate ROS damage. In humans, oxidative stress is linked with obesity, lack of exercise and poor nutrition, all of which are common in captive animals. Here, we tested whether small parrots (budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus) maintained in typical pet cages and on ad libitum food varied in oxidative profile, behaviour and body mass. Importantly, as with many birds held in captivity, they did not have enough space to engage in extensive free flight. Four types of oxidative damage, single-stranded DNA breaks (low-pH comet assay), alkali-labile sites in DNA (high-pH comet assay), sensitivity of DNA to ROS (H2O2-treated comet assay) and malondialdehyde (a byproduct of lipid peroxidation), were uncorrelated with each other and with plasma concentrations of dietary antioxidants. Without strenuous exercise over 28 days in a relatively small cage, more naturally 'active' individuals had more single-stranded DNA breaks than sedentary birds. High body mass at the start or end of the experiment, coupled with substantial mass gain, were all associated with raised sensitivity of DNA to ROS. Thus, high body mass in these captive birds was associated with oxidative damage. These birds were not lacking dietary antioxidants, because final body mass was positively related to plasma levels of retinol, zeaxanthin and α-tocopherol. Individuals varied widely in activity levels, feeding behaviour, mass gain and oxidative profile despite standardized living conditions. DNA damage is often associated with poor immunocompetence, low fertility and faster ageing. Thus, we have candidate mechanisms for the limited lifespan and fecundity common to many birds kept for conservation purposes.
许多鹦鹉物种被圈养用于保护,但它们往往繁殖能力差、健康状况不佳且存活率低。已知这些特征受氧化应激影响,即活性氧(ROS)产生与抗氧化防御系统减轻ROS损伤能力之间的失衡。在人类中,氧化应激与肥胖、缺乏运动和营养不良有关,而这些在圈养动物中都很常见。在这里,我们测试了饲养在典型宠物笼中并随意进食的小鹦鹉(虎皮鹦鹉,Melopsittacus undulatus)在氧化特征、行为和体重方面是否存在差异。重要的是,与许多圈养鸟类一样,它们没有足够的空间进行广泛的自由飞行。四种氧化损伤类型,即单链DNA断裂(低pH彗星试验)、DNA中的碱不稳定位点(高pH彗星试验)、DNA对ROS的敏感性(H2O2处理彗星试验)和丙二醛(脂质过氧化的副产物),彼此之间以及与膳食抗氧化剂的血浆浓度均无相关性。在相对较小的笼子里28天没有剧烈运动,较自然“活跃”的个体比久坐不动的鸟类有更多的单链DNA断裂。实验开始或结束时的高体重,加上显著的体重增加,都与DNA对ROS的敏感性增加有关。因此,这些圈养鸟类的高体重与氧化损伤有关。这些鸟类并不缺乏膳食抗氧化剂,因为最终体重与视黄醇、玉米黄质和α-生育酚的血浆水平呈正相关。尽管生活条件标准化,但个体在活动水平、摄食行为、体重增加和氧化特征方面差异很大。DNA损伤通常与免疫能力差、生育力低和衰老加快有关。因此,我们有了许多用于保护目的而饲养的鸟类普遍存在寿命和繁殖力受限的候选机制。