• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于改善阿尔茨海默病照料者健康状况的II期干预措施实施过程中的种族和民族差异。

Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Delivery of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health II Intervention.

作者信息

Graham-Phillips Anita, Roth David L, Huang Jin, Dilworth-Anderson Peggye, Gitlin Laura N

机构信息

THREAD Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.

Center on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1662-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14204. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.14204
PMID:27294873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4988871/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether there are racial and ethnicity group differences in Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH II) intervention delivery.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Community-based intervention delivered at five sites across the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Family caregivers of persons with dementia who were randomized to the active intervention condition (N = 323).

INTERVENTION

Nine in-home sessions (90 minutes each) and three telephone sessions (30 minutes each) were intended to be delivered and designed to reduce caregiver burden and depression, improve caregiver self-care and social support, and help caregivers manage behavior problems in persons with dementia.

MEASUREMENTS

Interventionists recorded the type of intervention (home or telephone), start and stop times, and whether specific intervention content modules (e.g., stress management, social support) were administered in each session.

RESULTS

Overall, REACH II intervention delivery was high, with more than 80% of randomized caregivers completing at least five in-home sessions and receiving eight or more hours of intervention contact, but black caregivers completed fewer in-home sessions (mean 6.98) than Hispanics (mean 7.84) or whites (mean 8.25) and received less total intervention contact time (mean 683 minutes) than Hispanics (mean 842 minutes) or whites (mean 798 minutes). No significant differences in exposure to content according to race or ethnicity were found after controlling for demographic covariates.

CONCLUSION

Blacks in REACH II received significantly less intervention contact. Similar multicomponent interventions should examine whether there are systematic differences in intervention delivery across specific demographic subgroups and explore implications for treatment outcomes.

摘要

目的

确定在强化阿尔茨海默病护理者健康资源(REACH II)干预实施方面是否存在种族和族裔群体差异。

设计

随机对照试验。

设置

在美国五个地点开展的基于社区的干预。

参与者

被随机分配到积极干预组的痴呆症患者的家庭护理者(N = 323)。

干预

计划进行九次家庭访视(每次90分钟)和三次电话随访(每次30分钟),旨在减轻护理者负担和抑郁情绪,改善护理者自我护理和社会支持,并帮助护理者管理痴呆症患者的行为问题。

测量

干预者记录干预类型(家庭访视或电话随访)、开始和结束时间,以及每次访视中是否实施了特定的干预内容模块(如压力管理、社会支持)。

结果

总体而言,REACH II干预的实施率较高,超过80%被随机分配的护理者完成了至少五次家庭访视并接受了八小时或更长时间的干预接触,但黑人护理者完成的家庭访视次数(平均6.98次)少于西班牙裔(平均7.84次)或白人(平均8.25次),且接受的总干预接触时间(平均683分钟)少于西班牙裔(平均842分钟)或白人(平均798分钟)。在控制人口统计学协变量后,未发现种族或族裔在接触内容方面存在显著差异。

结论

REACH II中的黑人接受的干预接触显著较少。类似的多成分干预应检查在特定人口亚组的干预实施中是否存在系统差异,并探讨对治疗结果的影响。

相似文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Delivery of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health II Intervention.用于改善阿尔茨海默病照料者健康状况的II期干预措施实施过程中的种族和民族差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1662-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14204. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
2
Enhancing the quality of life of dementia caregivers from different ethnic or racial groups: a randomized, controlled trial.提高不同种族或民族痴呆症护理人员的生活质量:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Nov 21;145(10):727-38. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-10-200611210-00005.
3
Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia.远程为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者提供信息、培训和支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD006440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006440.pub3.
4
2021 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2021 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Mar;17(3):327-406. doi: 10.1002/alz.12328. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
5
Enhancing caregiver health: findings from the resources for enhancing Alzheimer's caregiver health II intervention.增强照护者健康:强化阿尔茨海默病照护者健康 II 干预资源研究结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jan;58(1):30-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02631.x.
6
The cost-effectiveness of a behavior intervention with caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease.针对阿尔茨海默病患者照料者的行为干预措施的成本效益
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Mar;56(3):413-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01569.x. Epub 2007 Dec 27.
7
Concordance of race or ethnicity of interventionists and caregivers of dementia patients: relationship to attrition and treatment outcomes in the REACH study.痴呆症患者干预者与照料者的种族或族裔一致性:与REACH研究中的失访及治疗结果的关系
Gerontologist. 2006 Aug;46(4):449-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.4.449.
8
German adaptation of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health II: study protocol of a single-centred, randomised controlled trial.《增强阿尔茨海默病照料者健康资源II》的德语改编版:一项单中心随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Feb 12;14:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-21.
9
Individualized support for informal caregivers of people with dementia - effectiveness of the German adaptation of REACH II.针对痴呆症患者的非正式照护者的个性化支持 - REACH II 德国适应性研究的效果。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0678-y.
10
Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health in Vietnam (REACH VN): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a family dementia caregiver intervention in Vietnam.用于增强越南阿尔茨海默病照护者健康的资源(REACH VN):一项在越南测试家庭痴呆症照护者干预有效性的群组随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 May 9;23(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06228-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Financial Toxicity in Dementia Caregiving: Sociodemographic Predictors in a U.S. Nationally Representative Survey.痴呆症照护中的经济负担:美国全国代表性调查中的社会人口学预测因素
Gerontologist. 2025 May 10;65(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf092.
2
Two-year follow-up of dementia caregivers after a digital health intervention WECARE: a mixed-method study.数字健康干预WECARE后痴呆症照料者的两年随访:一项混合方法研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2025 Apr;29(4):631-638. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2449141. Epub 2025 Jan 5.
3
Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: An evidence and gap map.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward a multidimensional understanding of culture for health interventions.迈向对健康干预中文化的多维度理解。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;144:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
2
2015 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2015 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Mar;11(3):332-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.02.003.
3
Associations of Social Support and 8-Year Follow-Up Depressive Symptoms: Differences in African American and White Caregivers.社会支持与8年随访期抑郁症状的关联:非裔美国人和白人照顾者的差异
改善居家老年人功能能力的健康、社会护理及技术干预措施:一项证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 7;17(3):e1175. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1175. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
Easing the burden of dementia caregiving: Protocol development for a telephone-delivered mindfulness intervention for rural, African American families.减轻痴呆症护理负担:为美国农村非裔家庭开发的电话正念干预方案
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Oct 28;30:101031. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101031. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Differential race effects of the tailored activity program (TAP) on dementia-related behaviors: A randomized controlled trial.个体化活动方案(TAP)对痴呆相关行为的差异化种族效应:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Nov;70(11):3105-3115. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17981. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
6
Including ethnic minorities in dementia research: Recommendations from a scoping review.将少数民族纳入痴呆症研究:一项范围综述的建议
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Apr 29;8(1):e12222. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12222. eCollection 2022.
7
Selecting Outcomes to Ensure Pragmatic Trials Are Relevant to People Living with Dementia.选择结局指标以确保痴呆患者参与的实用临床试验具有相关性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S55-S61. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16619.
8
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Serious Psychological Distress Among Those With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.在患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的人群中,严重心理困扰的种族和民族差异。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(4):478-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
9
Motivations for Participation in Parkinson Disease Genetic Research Among Hispanics versus Non-Hispanics.西班牙裔与非西班牙裔参与帕金森病基因研究的动机
Front Genet. 2019 Jul 16;10:658. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00658. eCollection 2019.
10
Psychological Interventions for Dementia Caregivers: What We Have Achieved, What We Have Learned.痴呆症照护者的心理干预:我们取得了什么成就,我们学到了什么。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Jun 6;21(7):59. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1045-9.
Clin Gerontol. 2012 Jun 1;35(4):289-302. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2012.678569.
4
Cultural adaptations of behavioral health interventions: a progress report.行为健康干预措施的文化调适:进展报告。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Apr;81(2):196-205. doi: 10.1037/a0027085. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
5
Assessing the sensitivity of methods for estimating principal causal effects.评估估计主要因果效应方法的敏感性。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Dec;24(6):657-74. doi: 10.1177/0962280211421840. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
6
Caregiving, residence, race, and depressive symptoms.照料、居住地点、种族与抑郁症状。
Aging Ment Health. 2010 Sep;14(7):771-8. doi: 10.1080/13607861003713257.
7
Enhancing caregiver health: findings from the resources for enhancing Alzheimer's caregiver health II intervention.增强照护者健康:强化阿尔茨海默病照护者健康 II 干预资源研究结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jan;58(1):30-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02631.x.
8
The moderating influence of demographic characteristics, social support, and religious coping on the effectiveness of a multicomponent psychosocial caregiver intervention in three racial ethnic groups.人口统计学特征、社会支持和宗教应对对多组分心理社会照顾者干预在三个种族群体中的有效性的调节作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Mar;65B(2):185-94. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp131. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
9
Mediation and moderation of treatment effects in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions.随机对照试验中复杂干预措施治疗效果的中介和调节作用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2010 Jun;19(3):237-70. doi: 10.1177/0962280209105014. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
10
How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.我们如何提高研究成果向实际应用的转化?所需的证据类型。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413-33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145.