Graham-Phillips Anita, Roth David L, Huang Jin, Dilworth-Anderson Peggye, Gitlin Laura N
THREAD Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Center on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1662-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14204. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
To determine whether there are racial and ethnicity group differences in Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH II) intervention delivery.
Randomized controlled trial.
Community-based intervention delivered at five sites across the United States.
Family caregivers of persons with dementia who were randomized to the active intervention condition (N = 323).
Nine in-home sessions (90 minutes each) and three telephone sessions (30 minutes each) were intended to be delivered and designed to reduce caregiver burden and depression, improve caregiver self-care and social support, and help caregivers manage behavior problems in persons with dementia.
Interventionists recorded the type of intervention (home or telephone), start and stop times, and whether specific intervention content modules (e.g., stress management, social support) were administered in each session.
Overall, REACH II intervention delivery was high, with more than 80% of randomized caregivers completing at least five in-home sessions and receiving eight or more hours of intervention contact, but black caregivers completed fewer in-home sessions (mean 6.98) than Hispanics (mean 7.84) or whites (mean 8.25) and received less total intervention contact time (mean 683 minutes) than Hispanics (mean 842 minutes) or whites (mean 798 minutes). No significant differences in exposure to content according to race or ethnicity were found after controlling for demographic covariates.
Blacks in REACH II received significantly less intervention contact. Similar multicomponent interventions should examine whether there are systematic differences in intervention delivery across specific demographic subgroups and explore implications for treatment outcomes.
确定在强化阿尔茨海默病护理者健康资源(REACH II)干预实施方面是否存在种族和族裔群体差异。
随机对照试验。
在美国五个地点开展的基于社区的干预。
被随机分配到积极干预组的痴呆症患者的家庭护理者(N = 323)。
计划进行九次家庭访视(每次90分钟)和三次电话随访(每次30分钟),旨在减轻护理者负担和抑郁情绪,改善护理者自我护理和社会支持,并帮助护理者管理痴呆症患者的行为问题。
干预者记录干预类型(家庭访视或电话随访)、开始和结束时间,以及每次访视中是否实施了特定的干预内容模块(如压力管理、社会支持)。
总体而言,REACH II干预的实施率较高,超过80%被随机分配的护理者完成了至少五次家庭访视并接受了八小时或更长时间的干预接触,但黑人护理者完成的家庭访视次数(平均6.98次)少于西班牙裔(平均7.84次)或白人(平均8.25次),且接受的总干预接触时间(平均683分钟)少于西班牙裔(平均842分钟)或白人(平均798分钟)。在控制人口统计学协变量后,未发现种族或族裔在接触内容方面存在显著差异。
REACH II中的黑人接受的干预接触显著较少。类似的多成分干预应检查在特定人口亚组的干预实施中是否存在系统差异,并探讨对治疗结果的影响。