Hart Danielle M, Leggins Brandon, Sanches Clara, Guterman Elan L, Chiong Winston
Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Gerontologist. 2025 May 10;65(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf092.
"Financial toxicity" describes the negative effects of medical expenses on financial security and health-related quality of life. Beyond dementia, financial toxicity is used to address the financial and health consequences of illness. Here, we utilize the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) to examine the experience of financial toxicity in dementia caregiving.
We conducted a nationally representative survey of 317 dementia caregivers. Financial toxicity was defined as COST<26 and categorized as mild (COST ≥14 and <26), moderate (COST >0 and <14), or severe (COST = 0). Nested multivariable regression examined potential predictors of financial toxicity. Mediation analyses were performed to assess whether the influence of basic caregiver demographic predictors was mediated by care recipient clinical characteristics, caregiver socioeconomic demographics, or relational characteristics.
52.7% of dementia caregivers in the United States experience financial toxicity. Of those, 73.1% endure mild, 25.7% moderate, and 1.2% severe toxicity. 69.5% of Black, 54.1% of Hispanic, and 42.3% of White caregivers report financial toxicity, with prevalence significantly higher in Black caregivers compared to White caregivers (p = .017). Older caregiver age was associated with less financial toxicity (p = .024). Caregiver employment status mediated this effect, with retirement associated with less financial toxicity (p < .001) and unemployment associated with greater financial toxicity (p < .001).
Most dementia caregivers in the United States experience financial toxicity, with Black caregivers bearing the highest risk. Older caregiver age protects against financial toxicity, reflecting the relationship between age and employment status.
“经济毒性”描述了医疗费用对财务安全和健康相关生活质量的负面影响。除痴呆症外,经济毒性还用于探讨疾病的财务和健康后果。在此,我们利用经济毒性综合评分(COST)来研究痴呆症护理中的经济毒性体验。
我们对317名痴呆症护理人员进行了一项具有全国代表性的调查。经济毒性定义为COST<26,并分为轻度(COST≥14且<26)、中度(COST>0且<14)或重度(COST = 0)。嵌套多变量回归分析了经济毒性的潜在预测因素。进行中介分析以评估基本护理人员人口统计学预测因素的影响是否由受护理者的临床特征、护理人员的社会经济人口统计学特征或关系特征介导。
美国52.7%的痴呆症护理人员经历了经济毒性。其中,73.1%承受轻度毒性,25.7%承受中度毒性,1.2%承受重度毒性。69.5%的黑人、54.1%的西班牙裔和42.3%的白人护理人员报告有经济毒性,黑人护理人员的患病率显著高于白人护理人员(p = .017)。护理人员年龄较大与经济毒性较低相关(p = .024)。护理人员的就业状况介导了这种影响,退休与经济毒性较低相关(p < .001),失业与经济毒性较高相关(p < .001)。
美国大多数痴呆症护理人员经历了经济毒性,黑人护理人员面临的风险最高。护理人员年龄较大可预防经济毒性,这反映了年龄与就业状况之间的关系。