Smith Helen M, Dickman Chris R, Banks Peter B
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 13;11(6):e0156180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156180. eCollection 2016.
Exotic predators are a major threat to native wildlife in many parts of the world. Developing and implementing effective strategies to mitigate their effects requires robust quantitative data so that management can be evidence-based, yet in many ecosystems this is missing. Birds in particular have been severely impacted by exotic mammalian predators, and a plethora of studies on islands record predation of bird eggs, fledglings and adults by exotic species such as rodents, stoats and cats. By comparison, few studies have examined nest predation around mainland urban centres which often act as dispersal hubs, especially for commensal species such as rodents. Here, we experimentally examine nest predation rates in habitat patches with varying black rat (Rattus rattus) densities in Sydney, Australia and test whether these exotic rats have the effects expected of exotic predators using effect size benchmarks. In the case where black rats have replaced native Rattus spp., we expected that black rats, being more arboreal than native Rattus spp., would be a significant source of predation on birds because they can readily access the arboreal niche where many birds nest. We tested this idea using above-ground artificial nests to represent those of typical small bird species such as the New Holland honeyeater (Phylidonyris novaehollandiae). We found that fewer eggs were depredated by rodents on sites where we removed black rats compared to unmanipulated sites, and that the effect size calculated from the total number of eggs surviving beyond the typical incubation period was similar to that expected for an exotic predator. Our results suggest that, although Australian birds have co-evolved with native Rattus species, in the case where black rats have replaced native Rattus species, exotic black rats appear to pose an additive source of predation on birds in remnant habitats, most likely due to their ability to climb more efficiently than their native counterparts. Management of these commensal rodents may be necessary to retain urban birdlife.
外来食肉动物对世界许多地区的本土野生动物构成了重大威胁。制定和实施有效的策略来减轻它们的影响需要可靠的定量数据,以便管理能够基于证据,但在许多生态系统中,这些数据却缺失了。鸟类尤其受到外来哺乳动物食肉动物的严重影响,大量关于岛屿的研究记录了啮齿动物、白鼬和猫等外来物种对鸟蛋、雏鸟和成年鸟的捕食。相比之下,很少有研究考察大陆城市中心周边的巢穴捕食情况,而城市中心往往是扩散中心,尤其是对于啮齿动物等共生物种来说。在这里,我们通过实验研究了澳大利亚悉尼不同黑鼠(褐家鼠)密度的栖息地斑块中的巢穴捕食率,并使用效应量基准测试这些外来鼠是否具有外来食肉动物预期的影响。在黑鼠取代本土家鼠属物种的情况下,我们预计黑鼠比本土家鼠属物种更善于树栖,会成为鸟类捕食的重要来源,因为它们可以轻易进入许多鸟类筑巢的树栖生态位。我们用地面上的人工巢穴来代表典型的小型鸟类物种,如新荷兰蜜雀(新荷兰刺嘴莺)的巢穴,来验证这一想法。我们发现,与未处理的地点相比,在我们移除黑鼠的地点,啮齿动物捕食的鸟蛋更少,并且从超过典型孵化期存活的鸟蛋总数计算出的效应量与外来食肉动物预期的效应量相似。我们的结果表明,尽管澳大利亚鸟类与本土家鼠属物种共同进化,但在黑鼠取代本土家鼠属物种的情况下,外来黑鼠似乎在残余栖息地对鸟类构成了额外的捕食来源,很可能是因为它们比本土同类更善于攀爬。可能有必要对这些共生啮齿动物进行管理,以保留城市鸟类。