Reproductive Health is pleased to announce a mandatory open data policy in the journal.
作者信息
Salaria Natasha, Kenall Amye, Belizán José M
机构信息
BioMed Central, London, UK.
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), London, UK.
出版信息
Reprod Health. 2016 Jun 13;13(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0190-4.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reproductive Health is pleased to announce a mandatory open data policy in the journal.《生殖健康》很高兴宣布该期刊实行强制性开放数据政策。
Reprod Health. 2016 Jun 13;13(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0190-4.
2
The Open Access issue revisited.再谈开放获取问题。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):753-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.6624.
3
Open arms for open access: Toxicological Sciences joins "Oxford Open".张开双臂迎接开放获取：《毒理学科学》加入“牛津开放”。
Toxicol Sci. 2007 Dec;100(2):317. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm257.
4
Open Access to research findings and Community Dental Health.研究成果的开放获取与社区口腔健康。
Community Dent Health. 2015 Mar;32(1):2-3.
5
Open access orthodontics.开放获取正畸学
J Orthod. 2013 Jun;40(2):91-2. doi: 10.1179/1465312513Z.00000000085.
6
Announcement: Where are the data?公告：数据在哪里？
Nature. 2016 Sep 8;537(7619):138. doi: 10.1038/537138a.
7
Where are the data?
Nat Med. 2016 Oct 6;22(10):1064. doi: 10.1038/nm.4215.
8
Article visibility: journal impact factor and availability of full text in PubMed Central and open access.文章可见性：期刊影响因子以及在PubMed Central中的全文可用性和开放获取情况。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2013 Sep;24(8):295-6.
9
Moving towards open access: high-quality research and publication is essential, but visibility of the work is critical.迈向开放获取：高质量的研究与发表至关重要，但研究成果的可见性也至关重要。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2010;90(1):3. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0795.
10
Journal editors impasse with outcome reporting bias.期刊编辑在结果报告偏倚问题上陷入僵局。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2015 Sep;45(9):895-8. doi: 10.1111/eci.12484. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
本文引用的文献
1
Developing Global Norms for Sharing Data and Results during Public Health Emergencies.制定公共卫生紧急事件期间数据和结果共享的全球规范。
PLoS Med. 2016 Jan 5;13(1):e1001935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001935. eCollection 2016 Jan.
2
Antenatal care packages with reduced visits and perinatal mortality: a secondary analysis of the WHO antenatal care trial - Comentary: routine antenatal visits for healthy pregnant women do make a difference.产前保健套餐减少访视次数和围产儿死亡率：世卫组织产前保健试验的二次分析-评论：对健康孕妇进行常规产前检查确实有影响。
Reprod Health. 2013 Apr 12;10:20. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-20.
3
Antenatal care packages with reduced visits and perinatal mortality: a secondary analysis of the WHO Antenatal Care Trial.减少产检次数与围产期死亡率的产前护理套餐：世卫组织产前护理试验的二次分析
Reprod Health. 2013 Apr 12;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-19.
4
Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy.低风险妊娠的替代方案与标准产前护理套餐
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD000934. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000934.pub2.
5
WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care.世界卫生组织用于评估新型常规产前保健模式的产前保健随机试验。
Lancet. 2001 May 19;357(9268):1551-64. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04722-x.
Zotero 插件