Sharma Manan, Millner Patricia D, Hashem Fawzy, Camp Mary, Whyte Celia, Graham Lorna, Cotton Corrie P
Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Building 173 BARC-East, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA.
Department of Agriculture, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland 21853, USA.
J Food Prot. 2016 Jun;79(6):913-21. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-421.
Animal manure provides benefits to agriculture but may contain pathogens that contaminate ready-to-eat produce. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Organic Program standards include 90- or 120-day intervals between application of manure and harvest of crop to minimize risks of pathogen contamination of fresh produce. Data on factors affecting survival of Escherichia coli in soils under greenhouse conditions are needed. Three separate studies were conducted to evaluate survival of nonpathogenic E. coli (gEc) and attenuated E. coli O157:H7 (attO157) inoculated at either low (4 log CFU/ml) or high (6 log CFU/ml) populations over 56 days. Studies involved two pot sizes (small, 398 cm(3); large, 89 liters), three soil types (sandy loam, SL; clay loam, CL; silt loam, SIL), and four amendments (poultry litter, PL; dairy manure liquids, DML; horse manure, HM; unamended). Amendments were applied to the surface of the soil in either small or large containers. Study 1, conducted in regularly irrigated small containers, showed that populations of gEc and attO157 (2.84 to 2.88 log CFU/g) in PL-amended soils were significantly (P < 0.05) greater than those in DML-amended (0.29 to 0.32 log CFU/g [dry weight] [gdw]) or unamended (0.25 to 0.28 log CFU/gdw) soils; soil type did not affect E. coli survival. Results from study 2, in large pots with CL and SIL, showed that PL-amended soils supported significantly higher attO157 and gEc populations compared with HM-amended or unamended soils. Study 3 compared results from small and large containers that received high inoculum simultaneously. Overall, in both small and large containers, PLamended soils supported higher gEc and attO157 populations compared with HM-amended and unamended soils. Populations of attO157 were significantly greater in small containers (1.83 log CFU/gdw) than in large containers (0.65 log CFU/gdw) at week 8, perhaps because small containers received more regular irrigation than large pots. Regular irrigation of small pots may have affected E. coli persistence in manure-amended soils. Overall, PL-amended soils in both small and large containers supported E. coli survival at higher populations compared with DML-, HM-, or unamended soils.
动物粪便对农业有益,但可能含有会污染即食农产品的病原体。美国农业部国家有机项目标准规定,在施用粪便后与作物收获之间需间隔90天或120天,以尽量降低新鲜农产品受病原体污染的风险。我们需要有关温室条件下影响土壤中大肠杆菌存活因素的数据。为此开展了三项独立研究,以评估接种低(4 log CFU/ml)或高(6 log CFU/ml)菌量的非致病性大肠杆菌(gEc)和减毒大肠杆菌O157:H7(attO157)在56天内的存活情况。研究涉及两种花盆尺寸(小,398立方厘米;大,89升)、三种土壤类型(砂壤土,SL;粘壤土,CL;粉砂壤土,SIL)以及四种改良剂(家禽粪便,PL;奶牛场粪液,DML;马粪,HM;未改良)。改良剂施用于小容器或大容器中的土壤表面。在定期灌溉的小容器中进行的研究1表明,PL改良土壤中gEc和attO157的菌量(2.84至2.88 log CFU/g)显著(P < 0.05)高于DML改良土壤(0.29至0.32 log CFU/g[干重][gdw])或未改良土壤(0.25至0.28 log CFU/gdw);土壤类型不影响大肠杆菌的存活。在装有CL和SIL的大花盆中进行的研究2结果表明,与HM改良或未改良土壤相比,PL改良土壤中attO157和gEc的菌量显著更高。研究3比较了同时接种高菌量的小容器和大容器的结果。总体而言,在小容器和大容器中,与HM改良和未改良土壤相比,PL改良土壤中gEc和attO157的菌量更高。在第8周时,小容器中attO157的菌量(1.83 log CFU/gdw)显著高于大容器(0.65 log CFU/gdw),这可能是因为小容器比大花盆灌溉更频繁。小花盆的定期灌溉可能影响了大肠杆菌在粪便改良土壤中的持久性。总体而言,与DML、HM或未改良土壤相比,小容器和大容器中PL改良土壤支持更高菌量的大肠杆菌存活。