Rieck Jan-Henrik, Beyer Annika, Mewes Alexander, Caliebe Amke, Hey Matthias
Medical Faculty, CAU Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Audiology, ENT Clinic, UKSH Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2023 May 3;12(9):3262. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093262.
The outcome of cochlear implantation has improved over the last decades, but there are still patients with less benefit. Despite numerous studies examining the cochlear implant (CI) outcome, variations in speech comprehension with CI remains incompletely explained. The aim of this study was therefore to examine preoperative pure-tone audiogram and speech comprehension as well as aetiology, to investigate their relationship with postoperative speech comprehension in CI recipients.
A retrospective study with 664 ears of 530 adult patients was conducted. Correlations between the target variable postoperative word comprehension with the preoperative speech and sound comprehension as well as aetiology were investigated. Significant correlations were inserted into multivariate models. Speech comprehension measured as word recognition score at 70 dB with CI was analyzed as (i) a continuous and (ii) a dichotomous variable.
All variables that tested preoperative hearing were significantly correlated with the dichotomous target; with the continuous target, all except word comprehension at 65 dB with hearing aid. The strongest correlation with postoperative speech comprehension was seen for monosyllabic words with hearing aid at 80 dB. The preoperative maximum word comprehension was reached or surpassed by 97.3% of CI patients. Meningitis and congenital diseases were strongly negatively associated with postoperative word comprehension. The multivariate model was able to explain 40% of postoperative variability.
Speech comprehension with hearing aid at 80 dB can be used as a supplementary preoperative indicator of CI-aided speech comprehension and should be measured regularly in the clinical routine. Combining audiological and aetiological variables provides more insights into the variability of the CI outcome, allowing for better patient counselling.
在过去几十年中,人工耳蜗植入的效果有所改善,但仍有部分患者受益较少。尽管有大量研究探讨人工耳蜗(CI)植入的效果,但CI植入后言语理解的差异仍未得到充分解释。因此,本研究旨在检查术前纯音听力图和言语理解情况以及病因,以探讨它们与CI植入受者术后言语理解的关系。
对530例成年患者的664只耳进行回顾性研究。研究了目标变量术后单词理解与术前言语和声音理解以及病因之间的相关性。将显著相关性纳入多变量模型。以CI在70 dB时的单词识别分数衡量的言语理解被分析为(i)连续变量和(ii)二分变量。
所有术前听力测试变量与二分目标均显著相关;对于连续目标,除了使用助听器在65 dB时的单词理解外,所有变量均显著相关。与术后言语理解相关性最强的是使用助听器在80 dB时的单音节词。97.3%的CI患者达到或超过了术前最大单词理解能力。脑膜炎和先天性疾病与术后单词理解呈强烈负相关。多变量模型能够解释术后变异性的40%。
使用助听器在80 dB时的言语理解可作为CI辅助言语理解的补充术前指标,应在临床常规中定期测量。结合听力学和病因学变量可以更深入地了解CI植入效果的变异性,从而为患者提供更好的咨询服务。