Verbeeck Roger K, Günther Gunar, Kibuule Dan, Hunter Christian, Rennie Tim W
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.
Katutura State Hospital, Windhoek, Namibia.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;72(8):905-16. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2083-4. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the world's deadliest communicable diseases. Although cure rates of the standard four-drug (rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol) treatment schedule can be as high as 95-98 % under clinical trial conditions, success rates may be much lower in less well resourced countries. Unsuccessful treatment with these first-line anti-TB drugs may lead to the development of multidrug resistant and extensively drug resistant TB. The intrinsic interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the first-line anti-TB drugs is further exacerbated by co-morbidities such as HIV infection and diabetes.
Therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed in an attempt to optimize treatment outcome and reduce the development of drug resistance. Several studies have shown that maximum plasma concentrations (C max), especially of rifampicin and isoniazid, are well below the proposed target C max concentrations in a substantial fraction of patients being treated with the standard four-drug treatment schedule, even though treatment's success rate in these studies was typically at least 85 %.
The proposed target C max concentrations are based on the concentrations of these agents achieved in healthy volunteers and patients receiving the standard doses. Estimation of C max based on one or two sampling times may not have the necessary accuracy since absorption rate, especially for rifampicin, may be highly variable. In addition, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) variability should be taken into account to set clinically meaningful susceptibility breakpoints. Clearly, there is a need to better define the key target PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the first-line anti-TB drugs to be efficacious, C max (or area under the curve (AUC)) and C max/MIC (or AUC/MIC).
Although TDM of first-line anti-TB drugs has been successfully used in a limited number of specialized centers to improve treatment outcome in slow responders, a better characterization of the target PK and/or PK/PD parameters is in our opinion necessary to make it cost-effective.
结核病仍然是世界上最致命的传染病之一。尽管在临床试验条件下,标准四联药物(利福平、异烟肼、吡嗪酰胺、乙胺丁醇)治疗方案的治愈率可高达95% - 98%,但在资源相对匮乏的国家,成功率可能要低得多。使用这些一线抗结核药物治疗失败可能会导致多重耐药和广泛耐药结核病的发生。一线抗结核药物药代动力学(PK)的个体内在差异会因诸如艾滋病毒感染和糖尿病等合并症而进一步加剧。
有人提出进行治疗药物监测,以优化治疗效果并减少耐药性的产生。多项研究表明,在接受标准四联治疗方案的相当一部分患者中,血浆最大浓度(Cmax),尤其是利福平和异烟肼的Cmax,远低于建议的目标Cmax浓度,尽管这些研究中的治疗成功率通常至少为85%。
建议的目标Cmax浓度是基于在健康志愿者和接受标准剂量的患者中所达到的这些药物的浓度。基于一两个采样时间点来估算Cmax可能没有必要的准确性,因为吸收率,尤其是利福平的吸收率,可能变化很大。此外,在设定具有临床意义的药敏折点时应考虑最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的变异性。显然,有必要更好地确定一线抗结核药物治疗药物监测(TDM)的关键目标PK和药效学(PD)参数,即Cmax(或曲线下面积(AUC))以及Cmax/MIC(或AUC/MIC),以使TDM有效。
尽管一线抗结核药物的TDM已在少数专业中心成功用于改善反应较慢患者的治疗效果,但我们认为,为了使其具有成本效益,有必要更好地描述目标PK和/或PK/PD参数。