Mojtahedzadeh Rita, Mohammadi Aeen, Kohan Noushin, Gharib Mitra, Zolfaghari Mitra
Department of E-learning in Medical Education, Virtual School, Center of Excellence for E-learning in Medical Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Acta Med Iran. 2016 Jun;54(6):401-6.
Delphi as a consensus development technique enables anonymous, systematic refinement of expert opinion with the aim of arriving at a combined or consensual position. In this study, we determined the criteria and their weights for Iranian Medical Schools' ranking through a Delphi process. An expert committee devised 13 proposed criteria with 32 indicators with their weights, which were arranged hierarchically in the form of a tree diagram. We used the Delphi technique to reach a consensus on these criteria and weights among the deans of 38 public Iranian medical schools. For this purpose, we devised and sent a questionnaire to schools and asked them to suggest or correct the criteria and their weights. We repeated this process in two rounds till all the schools reached an acceptable consensus on them. All schools reached a consensus on the set of 13 criteria and 30 indicators and their weights in three main contexts of education, research and facilities, and equipment which were used for Medical Schools' ranking. Using Delphi technique for devising the criteria and their weights in evaluation processes such as ranking makes their results more acceptable among universities.
德尔菲法作为一种共识达成技术,能够对专家意见进行匿名、系统的细化,目的是达成一个综合或一致的立场。在本研究中,我们通过德尔菲法确定了伊朗医学院校排名的标准及其权重。一个专家委员会设计了13项提议标准及32项指标及其权重,这些指标以树形图的形式分层排列。我们运用德尔菲技术,在38所伊朗公立医学院校的院长中就这些标准和权重达成共识。为此,我们设计并向各院校发送了一份问卷,要求他们提出或修正标准及其权重。我们分两轮重复这一过程,直到所有院校都对其达成可接受的共识。所有院校在教育、研究以及设施与设备这三个主要方面就13项标准、30项指标及其权重达成了共识,这些内容用于医学院校的排名。在诸如排名等评估过程中使用德尔菲技术来制定标准及其权重,会使结果在各大学中更易被接受。