Wyatt M C, Beswick A D, Kunutsor S K, Wilson M J, Whitehouse M R, Blom A W
Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jun 15;98(12):992-1000. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01142.
Synovial biomarkers have recently been adopted as diagnostic tools for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but their utility is uncertain. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the evidence on the accuracy of the alpha-defensin immunoassay and leukocyte esterase colorimetric strip test for the diagnosis of PJI compared with the Musculoskeletal Infection Society diagnostic criteria.
We performed a systematic review to identify diagnostic technique studies evaluating the accuracy of alpha-defensin or leukocyte esterase in the diagnosis of PJI. MEDLINE and Embase on Ovid, ACM, ADS, arXiv, CERN DS (Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire Document Server), CrossRef DOI (Digital Object Identifier), DBLP (Digital Bibliography & Library Project), Espacenet, Google Scholar, Gutenberg, HighWire, IEEE Xplore (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers digital library), INSPIRE, JSTOR (Journal Storage), OAlster (Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting), Open Content, Pubget, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for appropriate studies indexed from inception until May 30, 2015, along with unpublished or gray literature. The classification of studies and data extraction were performed independently by 2 reviewers. Data extraction permitted meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with construction of receiver operating characteristic curves for each test.
We included 11 eligible studies. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of alpha-defensin (6 studies) for PJI were 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.00) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.99), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for alpha-defensin and PJI was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.00). The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of leukocyte esterase (5 studies) for PJI were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.99), respectively. The AUC for leukocyte esterase and PJI was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95 to 0.98). There was substantial heterogeneity among studies for both diagnostic tests.
The diagnostic accuracy for PJI was high for both tests. Given the limited number of studies and the large cost difference between the tests, more independent research on these tests is warranted.
Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
滑膜生物标志物最近已被用作假体周围关节感染(PJI)的诊断工具,但其效用尚不确定。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是综合关于α-防御素免疫测定和白细胞酯酶比色条试验与肌肉骨骼感染学会诊断标准相比诊断PJI准确性的证据。
我们进行了一项系统评价,以确定评估α-防御素或白细胞酯酶诊断PJI准确性的诊断技术研究。检索了Ovid上的MEDLINE和Embase、ACM、ADS、arXiv、CERN DS(欧洲核研究组织文献服务器)、CrossRef DOI(数字对象标识符)、DBLP(数字文献与图书馆项目)、Espacenet、谷歌学术、古登堡计划、HighWire、IEEE Xplore(电气和电子工程师协会数字图书馆)、INSPIRE、JSTOR(期刊存档)、OAlster(元数据收割开放存档倡议协议)、开放内容、Pubget、PubMed和科学引文索引,以查找从创刊至2015年5月30日索引的适当研究,以及未发表或灰色文献。研究分类和数据提取由两名评审员独立进行。数据提取允许对敏感性和特异性进行荟萃分析,并为每个试验构建受试者工作特征曲线。
我们纳入了11项符合条件的研究。α-防御素(6项研究)对PJI的合并诊断敏感性和特异性分别为1.00(95%置信区间[CI],0.82至1.00)和0.96(95%CI,0.89至0.99)。α-防御素与PJI的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.99(95%CI,0.98至1.00)。白细胞酯酶(5项研究)对PJI的合并诊断敏感性和特异性分别为0.81(95%CI,0.49至0.95)和0.97(95%CI,0.82至0.99)。白细胞酯酶与PJI的AUC为0.97(95%CI,0.95至0.98)。两项诊断试验的研究之间存在很大异质性。
两项试验对PJI的诊断准确性都很高。鉴于研究数量有限以及试验之间的成本差异巨大,有必要对这些试验进行更多独立研究。
诊断性II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。