• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢维星、头孢唑林、强力霉素和普拉多氟沙星对犬源中间型葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌菌株的体外杀菌效果比较

Comparative in vitro killing of canine strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefovecin, cefazolin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin.

作者信息

Blondeau Joseph M, Shebelski Shantelle D

机构信息

Division of Clinical Microbiology, Royal University Hospital and Saskatoon Health Region, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada.

Departments of Microbiology and Immunology, Pathology and Ophthalmology, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada.

出版信息

Vet Dermatol. 2016 Aug;27(4):267-e63. doi: 10.1111/vde.12334. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1111/vde.12334
PMID:27307405
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bacterial eradication is necessary for clinical cure of infections and antimicrobial agents are important adjunctive therapies for inhibiting the growth of or killing bacteria. Pre-existing skin diseases predispose animals to infection by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and, more rarely, by Gram-negative bacilli. The property of rapid killing of bacteria may influence drug selection and duration of therapy in the setting of infection.

OBJECTIVES

To test the killing of canine isolates of S. pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefazolin, cefovecin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin at the minimum inhibitory, mutant prevention, maximum serum and maximum tissue drug concentrations.

METHODS

Under standard conditions, bacterial cells were exposed to clinically relevant drug concentrations in vitro and the log10 reduction (and % kill) of viable cells measured at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after drug exposure.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were seen between killing efficiencies by pradofloxacin versus the other agents, whereby pradofloxacin killed cells more rapidly than the others. For example, against the S. pseudintermedius strains, significantly more cells were killed by pradofloxacin following 15 min of maximum tissue drug concentration exposure than for cefazolin (P = 0.0002), cefovecin (P = 0.0007) and doxycycline (P ≤ 0.0001).

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

The rank order of potency based on these kill experiments was pradofloxacin > cefazolin > cefovecin > doxycycline. Rapid killing of bacteria affects the speed of clinical resolution and may influence drug selection and duration of therapy for skin infections.

摘要

背景

细菌清除对于感染的临床治愈是必要的,抗菌药物是抑制细菌生长或杀灭细菌的重要辅助治疗手段。皮肤疾病会使动物更容易感染中间型葡萄球菌,较少情况下也会感染革兰氏阴性杆菌。快速杀灭细菌的特性可能会影响感染情况下的药物选择和治疗持续时间。

目的

在最低抑菌浓度、突变预防浓度、最高血清浓度和最高组织药物浓度下,测试头孢唑林、头孢维星、强力霉素和普拉氟沙星对犬源中间型葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌分离株的杀菌效果。

方法

在标准条件下,将细菌细胞在体外暴露于临床相关药物浓度,并在药物暴露后5、10、15、20、25、30、60、120和180分钟测量活菌的log10减少量(及杀灭百分比)。

结果

普拉氟沙星与其他药物的杀菌效率存在统计学显著差异,普拉氟沙星比其他药物能更快速地杀灭细胞。例如,对于中间型葡萄球菌菌株,在最高组织药物浓度暴露15分钟后,普拉氟沙星杀灭的细胞比头孢唑林(P = 0.0002)、头孢维星(P = 0.0007)和强力霉素(P≤0.0001)显著更多。

结论及临床意义

基于这些杀菌实验的效力排序为普拉氟沙星>头孢唑林>头孢维星>强力霉素。细菌的快速杀灭会影响临床症状消退的速度,并可能影响皮肤感染的药物选择和治疗持续时间。

相似文献

1
Comparative in vitro killing of canine strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefovecin, cefazolin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin.头孢维星、头孢唑林、强力霉素和普拉多氟沙星对犬源中间型葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌菌株的体外杀菌效果比较
Vet Dermatol. 2016 Aug;27(4):267-e63. doi: 10.1111/vde.12334. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
2
In vitro killing of canine strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefazolin, cefovecin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin over a range of bacterial densities.在一系列细菌密度下,头孢唑林、头孢维星、强力霉素和普拉德氟沙星对犬源中间型葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌菌株的体外杀菌作用。
Vet Dermatol. 2020 Jun;31(3):187-e39. doi: 10.1111/vde.12835. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
3
In vitro interaction of some drug combinations to inhibit rapidly growing mycobacteria isolates from cats and dogs and these isolates' susceptibility to cefovecin and clofazimine.某些药物组合在体外对抑制从猫和狗身上分离出的快速生长分枝杆菌的相互作用以及这些分离株对头孢维星和氯法齐明的敏感性。
Aust Vet J. 2015 Jan-Feb;93(1-2):40-5. doi: 10.1111/avj.12279.
4
A pilot study on the comparative minimum inhibitory and mutant prevention concentration values for moxifloxacin and pradofloxacin against canine and human isolates of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and S. schleiferi.一项关于莫西沙星和普拉多沙星对犬源和人源中间型葡萄球菌及施氏葡萄球菌分离株的比较最小抑菌浓度和突变预防浓度值的初步研究。
Vet Dermatol. 2019 Dec;30(6):481-e142. doi: 10.1111/vde.12781. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
5
Usefulness of cefovecin disk-diffusion test for predicting mecA gene-containing strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and clinical efficacy of cefovecin in dogs with superficial pyoderma.头孢维星纸片扩散试验对预测含mecA基因的中间型葡萄球菌菌株的有用性及头孢维星对浅表脓皮病犬的临床疗效
Vet Dermatol. 2013 Feb;24(1):162-7.e35-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01100.x.
6
In vitro comparison of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius susceptibility to common cephalosporins used in dogs.犬用常见头孢菌素对中间型假葡萄球菌敏感性的体外比较
Vet Ther. 2010 Fall;11(3):E1-9.
7
Susceptibility of canine and feline bacterial pathogens to pradofloxacin and comparison with other fluoroquinolones approved for companion animals.犬猫细菌性病原体对普拉洛芬的敏感性及与其他已批准用于伴侣动物的氟喹诺酮类药物的比较。
Vet Microbiol. 2013 Feb 22;162(1):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
8
Bactericidal properties of pradofloxacin against veterinary pathogens.普拉洛芬对兽医病原体的杀菌特性。
Vet Microbiol. 2012 May 25;157(1-2):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.11.027. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
9
In Vitro Killing of Canine Urinary Tract Infection Pathogens by Ampicillin, Cephalexin, Marbofloxacin, Pradofloxacin, and Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole.氨苄西林、头孢氨苄、马波沙星、普拉氟沙星和甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑对犬尿路感染病原菌的体外杀灭作用
Microorganisms. 2021 Nov 2;9(11):2279. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9112279.
10
Comparative activity of pradofloxacin and marbofloxacin against coagulase-positive staphylococci in a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model based on canine pharmacokinetics.基于犬类药代动力学的药代动力学-药效学模型中,普拉德氟沙星和马波沙星对凝固酶阳性葡萄球菌的比较活性。
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Dec;35(6):571-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2011.01361.x. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Antimicrobial use guidelines for canine pyoderma by the International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases (ISCAID).国际伴侣动物传染病学会(ISCAID)制定的犬脓皮病抗菌药物使用指南。
Vet Dermatol. 2025 Jun;36(3):234-282. doi: 10.1111/vde.13342.
2
Comparative In Vitro Killing by Pradofloxacin in Comparison to Ceftiofur, Enrofloxacin, Florfenicol, Marbofloxacin, Tildipirosin, Tilmicosin and Tulathromycin against Bovine Respiratory Bacterial Pathogens.与头孢噻呋、恩诺沙星、氟苯尼考、马波沙星、替地珠单抗、替米考星和泰拉霉素相比,普拉德氟沙星对牛呼吸道细菌病原体的体外杀灭作用比较
Microorganisms. 2024 May 15;12(5):996. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12050996.
3
Comparative Minimum Inhibitory and Mutant Prevention Drug Concentrations for Pradofloxacin and Seven Other Antimicrobial Agents Tested against Bovine Isolates of and .
针对从牛身上分离出的[具体细菌名称未给出],对普拉德氟沙星及其他七种抗菌剂进行比较的最低抑菌浓度和突变预防浓度。
Pathogens. 2024 May 9;13(5):399. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13050399.
4
Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin.犬皮肤病原体的时间-杀菌分析:普拉德氟沙星与马波沙星的比较
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Oct 17;12(10):1548. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101548.
5
In Vitro Killing of Canine Urinary Tract Infection Pathogens by Ampicillin, Cephalexin, Marbofloxacin, Pradofloxacin, and Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole.氨苄西林、头孢氨苄、马波沙星、普拉氟沙星和甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑对犬尿路感染病原菌的体外杀灭作用
Microorganisms. 2021 Nov 2;9(11):2279. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9112279.
6
In vitro killing of canine strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefazolin, cefovecin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin over a range of bacterial densities.在一系列细菌密度下,头孢唑林、头孢维星、强力霉素和普拉德氟沙星对犬源中间型葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌菌株的体外杀菌作用。
Vet Dermatol. 2020 Jun;31(3):187-e39. doi: 10.1111/vde.12835. Epub 2020 Feb 6.