Suppr超能文献

对黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)专家型工具使用中物体功能特性利用的限制。

Constraints on the exploitation of the functional properties of objects in expert tool-using chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

作者信息

Povinelli Daniel J, Frey Scott H

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, USA.

Program in Occupational Therapy and Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Cortex. 2016 Sep;82:11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 24.

Abstract

Many species exploit immediately apparent dimensions of objects during tool use and manufacture and operate over internal perceptual representations of objects (they move and reorient objects in space, have rules of operation to deform or modify objects, etc). Humans, however, actively test for functionally relevant object properties before such operations begin, even when no previous percepts of a particular object's qualities in the domain have been established. We hypothesize that such prospective diagnostic interventions are a human specialization of cognitive function that has been entirely overlooked in the neuropsychological literature. We presented chimpanzees with visually identical rakes: one was functional for retrieving a food reward; the other was non-functional (its base was spring-loaded). Initially, they learned that only the functional tool could retrieve a distant reward. In test 1, we explored if they would manually test for the rakes' rigidity during tool selection, but before using it. We found no evidence of such behavior. In test 2, we obliged the apes to deform the non-functional tool's base before using it, in order to evaluate whether this would cause them to switch rakes. It did not. Tests 3-6 attempted to focus the apes' attention on the functionally relevant property (rigidity). Although one ape eventually learned to abandon the non-functional rake before using it, she still did not attempt to test the rakes for rigidity prior to use. While these results underscore the ability of chimpanzees to use novel tools, at the same time they point toward a fundamental (and heretofore unexplored) difference in causal reasoning between humans and apes. We propose that this behavioral difference reflects a human specialization in how object properties are represented, which could have contributed significantly to the evolution of our technological culture. We discuss developing a new line of evolutionarily motivated neuropsychological research on action disorders.

摘要

许多物种在使用和制造工具时会利用物体明显的外在特征,并基于对物体的内部感知表征进行操作(它们在空间中移动和重新定位物体,有使物体变形或改变的操作规则等)。然而,人类在进行此类操作之前,会主动测试与功能相关的物体属性,即使在该领域中尚未建立对特定物体特性的先前感知。我们假设这种前瞻性的诊断干预是认知功能的一种人类特化,而在神经心理学文献中完全被忽视了。我们向黑猩猩展示了外观相同的耙子:一个可用于获取食物奖励,另一个则无此功能(其底部装有弹簧)。最初,它们了解到只有功能性工具才能获取远处的奖励。在测试1中,我们探究它们在选择工具时,即在使用之前,是否会手动测试耙子的刚性。我们没有发现这种行为的证据。在测试2中,我们迫使猿类在使用非功能性工具之前先使其底部变形,以评估这是否会导致它们更换耙子。结果并非如此。测试3 - 6试图将猿类的注意力集中在与功能相关的属性(刚性)上。尽管有一只猿最终学会在使用之前放弃非功能性耙子,但她在使用之前仍然没有试图测试耙子的刚性。虽然这些结果强调了黑猩猩使用新型工具的能力,但同时也指出了人类和猿类在因果推理方面存在的根本(且迄今为止尚未探索)差异。我们认为这种行为差异反映了人类在物体属性表征方式上的特化,这可能对我们技术文化的进化有重大贡献。我们讨论了开展一系列新的基于进化动机的神经心理学研究来探讨行动障碍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验