• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年听力受损成年人对基于互联网的助听器交付方式的看法。

Perceptions Toward Internet-Based Delivery of Hearing Aids among Older Hearing-Impaired Adults.

作者信息

Chandra Navshika, Searchfield Grant D

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):441-457. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15058.

DOI:10.3766/jaaa.15058
PMID:27310403
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence that hearing aids can improve the social and psychological functioning of older hearing-impaired adults, hearing aid uptake is low. High cost of hearing aids and poor access to audiology services in rural areas are potential barriers to hearing aid acquisition. Methods of hearing aid delivery deviating from the traditional clinician-based model have been available to consumers for many years. One such method is Internet hearing aid sales. However, research exploring Internet-based hearing aid delivery, as a method to improve hearing aid uptake in this population, is limited.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of older hearing aid users (aged ≥65 yr) toward Internet-based hearing aid delivery.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A qualitative approach was adopted to investigate older adults' perceptions of buying hearing aids online.

STUDY SAMPLE

The sample consisted of 18 participants aged between 64 and 81 yr. Fourteen men and four women participated in this study. Participants were all experienced hearing aid users.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted. An interview schedule guided the interview. Interviews were recorded with a voice recorder and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis of the data was carried out.

RESULTS

Seven main themes emerged from the data. A general lack of awareness, but willingness to learn more about Internet hearing aid sales, was found. Two perceived benefits of Internet-based hearing aid delivery were identified: lower cost of hearing aids and greater convenience or physical accessibility. Numerous concerns and limitations were communicated. Concerns regarding the availability of clinical procedures, such as hearing tests, obtaining the correct-sized earmolds, and fine-tuning of hearing aids, were expressed. Participants conveyed distrust in online retailers. However, trust in and a preference for audiologists' expertise, which was not perceived to be available online, was found. Participants further conveyed a preference for face-to-face contact. Finally, in this sample, a general lack of familiarity and confidence in using the Internet was communicated.

CONCLUSIONS

Internet sales of hearing aids is a controversial topic in audiology. Although Internet-based delivery of hearing aids was perceived by older adults to be potentially beneficial, several shortcomings and concerns were conveyed. Irrespective of opinion of the role of Internet sales, audiologists should consider the opinions of the elderly as to how different service models may improve hearing aid uptake.

摘要

背景

尽管有证据表明助听器可以改善老年听力受损成年人的社交和心理功能,但助听器的使用率较低。助听器的高成本以及农村地区听力服务获取困难是获取助听器的潜在障碍。多年来,消费者可以选择偏离传统基于临床医生模式的助听器交付方式。其中一种方法是通过互联网销售助听器。然而,探索基于互联网的助听器交付方式以提高该群体助听器使用率的研究有限。

目的

本研究的目的是探讨老年助听器使用者(年龄≥65岁)对基于互联网的助听器交付方式的看法。

研究设计

采用定性方法调查老年人对在线购买助听器的看法。

研究样本

样本包括18名年龄在64至81岁之间的参与者。14名男性和4名女性参与了本研究。参与者均为有经验的助听器使用者。

数据收集与分析

进行面对面的半结构化访谈。访谈提纲指导访谈过程。访谈用录音机记录并逐字转录。对数据进行主题分析。

结果

数据中出现了七个主要主题。发现普遍缺乏认知,但愿意更多地了解互联网助听器销售。确定了基于互联网的助听器交付方式的两个感知益处:助听器成本较低以及更大的便利性或身体可达性。也表达了许多担忧和限制。表达了对临床程序可用性的担忧,如听力测试、获得尺寸合适的耳模以及助听器的微调。参与者对在线零售商表示不信任。然而,发现他们信任并偏好听力学家的专业知识,而认为在线无法获得这种专业知识。参与者还表示更喜欢面对面接触。最后,在这个样本中,普遍缺乏对使用互联网的熟悉度和信心。

结论

助听器的互联网销售在听力学领域是一个有争议的话题。尽管老年人认为基于互联网的助听器交付方式可能有益,但也表达了一些缺点和担忧。无论对互联网销售作用的看法如何,听力学家都应考虑老年人对于不同服务模式如何提高助听器使用率的意见。

相似文献

1
Perceptions Toward Internet-Based Delivery of Hearing Aids among Older Hearing-Impaired Adults.老年听力受损成年人对基于互联网的助听器交付方式的看法。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):441-457. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15058.
2
Experienced hearing aid users' perspectives of assessment and communication within audiology: a qualitative study using digital methods.有经验的助听器用户对听力学评估和交流的看法:使用数字方法的定性研究。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Nov;61(11):956-964. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1998839. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
3
The Effects of Service-Delivery Model and Purchase Price on Hearing-Aid Outcomes in Older Adults: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.服务提供模式和购买价格对老年人助听器使用效果的影响:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验
Am J Audiol. 2017 Mar 1;26(1):53-79. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0111.
4
Feasibility and Assessment of a Hybrid Audiology Service Delivery Model for Older Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Pilot Study.老年助听器使用者混合听力学服务提供模式的可行性和评估:一项试点研究。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Sep 21;31(3S):892-904. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00200. Epub 2022 May 3.
5
Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids Enable and Empower Self-Management of Hearing Loss: A Qualitative Interview Study Underpinned by the Behavior Change Wheel.智能手机连接的助听器促进并增强听力损失的自我管理:一项基于行为改变轮的定性访谈研究
Ear Hear. 2022 May/Jun;43(3):921-932. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001143.
6
A Qualitative Case Study of Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids: Influences on Patients, Clinicians, and Patient-Clinician Interactions.一项关于智能手机连接助听器的定性案例研究:对患者、临床医生及医患互动的影响
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Jun;28(6):506-521. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15153.
7
Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Adoption and Use: A Qualitative Study.影响助听器采用与使用的因素:一项定性研究。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Apr;29(4):300-312. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16148.
8
Optimal hearing aid use: focus groups with hearing aid clients and audiologists.最佳助听器使用:助听器使用者和听力学家焦点小组。
Ear Hear. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):193-202. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826a8ecd.
9
Comparisons of client and clinician views of the importance of factors in client-clinician interaction in hearing aid purchase decisions.客户与临床医生对于助听器购买决策中客户-临床医生互动因素重要性的观点比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Mar;26(3):247-59. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.3.5.
10
Client labor: adults with hearing impairment describing their participation in their hearing help-seeking and rehabilitation.客户工作:有听力障碍的成年人描述他们寻求听力帮助和康复的经历。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Mar;24(3):192-204. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.3.5.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of ear and hearing health research in Aotearoa New Zealand: a focus on equity.新西兰奥塔哥地区耳与听力健康研究的范围综述:聚焦公平性
J R Soc N Z. 2025 Jan 15;55(3):611-632. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2024.2435394. eCollection 2025.
2
Customer Archetypes in Hearing Health Care.听力保健中的客户类型。
Am J Audiol. 2023 Dec 4;32(4):941-949. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJA-23-00095. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
Feasibility and Assessment of a Hybrid Audiology Service Delivery Model for Older Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Pilot Study.
老年助听器使用者混合听力学服务提供模式的可行性和评估:一项试点研究。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Sep 21;31(3S):892-904. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00200. Epub 2022 May 3.
4
Hearing aids: indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control.助听器:适应症、技术、适配及质量控制。
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec 18;16:Doc08. doi: 10.3205/cto000147. eCollection 2017.
5
Applications of direct-to-consumer hearing devices for adults with hearing loss: a review.面向成年听力损失患者的直接面向消费者的听力设备应用:一项综述。
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 May 18;12:859-871. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S135390. eCollection 2017.