Suppr超能文献

对电子烟政策的支持:一项针对英国吸烟者和已戒烟者的调查。

Support for e-cigarette policies: a survey of smokers and ex-smokers in Great Britain.

作者信息

Brose Leonie S, Partos Timea R, Hitchman Sara C, McNeill Ann

机构信息

Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies (UKCTAS), London, UK.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e7-e15. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052987. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

E-cigarette regulations are the topic of extensive debate. Approaches vary worldwide, and limited evidence is available on public support for specific policies or what influences support. The present study aimed to assess smokers' and ex-smokers' support for 3 e-cigarette policies: (1) equal or higher availability relative to cigarettes, (2) advertising, (3) use in smoke-free places, and to assess changes in support over time and associations with respondent characteristics.

METHODS

Smokers and ex-smokers (n=1848) provided 3279 observations over 2 waves (2013 and 2014) of a longitudinal web-based survey in Great Britain. Multivariable logistic regressions fitted using generalised estimating equations assessed change in policy support over time, and associations between support and demographics (age, gender and income), smoking and e-cigarette use status, nicotine knowledge and perceived relative harm.

RESULTS

Equal or higher relative availability was supported by 79% in 2013 and 76% in 2014; advertising by 66% and 56%, respectively; neither change was significant in adjusted analyses. Support for use in smoke-free places decreased significantly from 55% to 45%. Compared with ex-smokers, smokers were more likely to support advertising and use in smoke-free places. Respondents using e-cigarettes, those who perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes, and those with more accurate knowledge about nicotine were more likely to support all 3 policies.

CONCLUSIONS

Less restrictive e-cigarette policies were more likely to be supported by e-cigarette users, and respondents who perceived e-cigarettes to be less harmful than cigarettes, or knew that nicotine was not a main cause of harm to health.

摘要

引言

电子烟法规是广泛辩论的话题。全球范围内的监管方式各不相同,关于公众对特定政策的支持情况或影响支持的因素,现有证据有限。本研究旨在评估吸烟者和已戒烟者对三项电子烟政策的支持情况:(1)与香烟相比同等或更高的可得性;(2)广告宣传;(3)在无烟场所使用,并评估支持率随时间的变化以及与受访者特征的关联。

方法

吸烟者和已戒烟者(n = 1848)在英国一项基于网络的纵向调查的两波调查(2013年和2014年)中提供了3279份观察数据。使用广义估计方程进行多变量逻辑回归,评估政策支持率随时间的变化,以及支持率与人口统计学特征(年龄、性别和收入)、吸烟和电子烟使用状况、尼古丁知识以及感知相对危害之间的关联。

结果

2013年,79%的人支持同等或更高的相对可得性,2014年这一比例为76%;支持广告宣传的比例分别为66%和56%;在调整分析中,这两个变化均无显著意义。对在无烟场所使用电子烟的支持率从55%显著降至45%。与已戒烟者相比,吸烟者更有可能支持广告宣传以及在无烟场所使用电子烟。使用电子烟的受访者、那些认为电子烟比香烟危害小的人以及对尼古丁了解更准确的人更有可能支持所有三项政策。

结论

限制较少的电子烟政策更有可能得到电子烟使用者、那些认为电子烟比香烟危害小或知道尼古丁不是健康危害主要原因的受访者的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e514/5739866/cc265e1b6879/tobaccocontrol-2016-052987f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验