Li Mei-Yi, Hu Xiao-Xia, Zhong Jian-Hong, Chen Lu-Lu, Lin Yong-Xiu
Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530021, P.R. China; Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care, Changsha, Hunan 410007, P.R. China.
Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530021, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2016 Jun;11(6):3849-3857. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4467. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
The purpose of the current review was to examine whether systematic lymphadenectomy is safe and effective for treating early-stage endometrial cancer. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched during April 2014 to identify studies comparing the use of systematic lymphadenectomy and no systematic lymphadenectomy in parallel for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer. A total of 13 eligible studies involving 51,155 patients were included in this review. The median overall survival (OS) rate at 5 years following lymphadenectomy was 90% (range, 73.1-98.3%) for patients undergoing the systematic procedure and 88.2% (range, 68-98.4%) for patients not undergoing the systematic procedure. For the two types of lymphadenectomy, OS has tended to improve over the last 20 years. The combined rate of disease-free and progression-free survival was higher in patients who underwent systematic lymphadenectomy, and the recurrence rate was lower. In particular, systematic lymphadenectomy was associated with markedly higher OS than the non-systematic procedure for patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer when ≥11 lymph nodes were removed. Systematic lymphadenectomy demonstrates clinical benefit in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer and should thus be a standard treatment option. In conclusion, systematic lymphadenectomy leads to higher OS than no systematic lymphadenectomy in intermediate- and high-risk patients with early-stage endometrial cancer, particularly when the procedure removes ≥11 lymph nodes.
本综述的目的是探讨系统性淋巴结清扫术治疗早期子宫内膜癌是否安全有效。于2014年4月对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和中国知网数据库进行系统检索,以确定比较系统性淋巴结清扫术与非系统性淋巴结清扫术同期治疗早期子宫内膜癌的研究。本综述共纳入13项符合条件的研究,涉及51,155例患者。接受系统性手术的患者淋巴结清扫术后5年的中位总生存率(OS)为90%(范围73.1 - 98.3%),未接受系统性手术的患者为88.2%(范围68 - 98.4%)。在过去20年中,两种类型的淋巴结清扫术的OS均有改善趋势。接受系统性淋巴结清扫术的患者无病生存率和无进展生存率的合并率更高,复发率更低。特别是,对于中高危子宫内膜癌患者,当切除≥11个淋巴结时,系统性淋巴结清扫术的OS明显高于非系统性手术。系统性淋巴结清扫术对早期子宫内膜癌患者具有临床益处,因此应成为标准治疗选择。总之,对于早期子宫内膜癌的中高危患者而言,系统性淋巴结清扫术比非系统性淋巴结清扫术能带来更高的OS,特别是当手术切除≥11个淋巴结时。