Suppr超能文献

修剪还是调整?典型发展过程中面部特化的成熟模式。

Pruning or tuning? Maturational profiles of face specialization during typical development.

机构信息

Department of Psychology Shihezi University Xinjiang China; Department of Neurosciences Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina 29425.

Department of Psychology College of Arts and Sciences University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky 40506.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2016 Apr 15;6(6):e00464. doi: 10.1002/brb3.464. eCollection 2016 Jun.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Face processing undergoes significant developmental change with age. Two kinds of developmental changes in face specialization were examined in this study: specialized maturation, or the continued tuning of a region to faces but little change in the tuning to other categories; and competitive interactions, or the continued tuning to faces accompanied by decreased tuning to nonfaces (i.e., pruning).

METHODS

Using fMRI, in regions where adults showed a face preference, a face- and object-specialization index were computed for younger children (5-8 years), older children (9-12 years) and adults (18-45 years). The specialization index was scaled to each subject's maximum activation magnitude in each region to control for overall age differences in the activation level.

RESULTS

Although no regions showed significant face specialization in the younger age group, regions strongly associated with social cognition (e.g., right posterior superior temporal sulcus, right inferior orbital cortex) showed specialized maturation, in which tuning to faces increased with age but there was no pruning of nonface responses. Conversely, regions that are associated with more basic perceptual processing or motor mirroring (right middle temporal cortex, right inferior occipital cortex, right inferior frontal opercular cortex) showed competitive interactions in which tuning to faces was accompanied by pruning of object responses with age.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall findings suggest that cortical maturation for face processing is regional-specific and involves both increased tuning to faces and diminished response to nonfaces. Regions that show competitive interactions likely support a more generalized function that is co-opted for face processing with development, whereas regions that show specialized maturation increase their tuning to faces, potentially in an activity-dependent, experience-driven manner.

摘要

简介

面部处理随着年龄的增长而发生显著的发展变化。本研究考察了面部专业化的两种发展变化:专门化成熟,即区域对面部的持续调整,但对面部以外的其他类别的调整变化很小;以及竞争相互作用,即对脸部的持续调整伴随着对非脸部(即修剪)的调整减少。

方法

使用 fMRI,在成年人表现出对脸部偏好的区域中,为年龄较小的儿童(5-8 岁)、年龄较大的儿童(9-12 岁)和成年人(18-45 岁)计算了脸部和物体专业化指数。该专业化指数与每个区域中每个受试者的最大激活幅度进行了标准化,以控制每个区域中总体年龄差异对激活水平的影响。

结果

虽然在年龄较小的组中没有发现明显的脸部专门化区域,但与社会认知强烈相关的区域(例如,右侧后上颞叶、右侧下眶额皮层)表现出专门化成熟,即随着年龄的增长,对脸部的调整增加,但对面部以外的反应没有修剪。相反,与更基本的感知处理或运动镜像相关的区域(右侧中颞叶、右侧下枕叶皮层、右侧下额眶皮层)表现出竞争相互作用,即随着年龄的增长,对脸部的调整伴随着对面部以外的反应的修剪。

结论

总体研究结果表明,面部处理的皮质成熟是区域特异性的,涉及到对脸部的调整增加和对面部以外的反应减少。表现出竞争相互作用的区域可能支持更通用的功能,随着发展被共同用于面部处理,而表现出专门化成熟的区域则增加了对脸部的调整,可能是以活动依赖性、经验驱动的方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36f/4907975/b9e1f08bb5a8/BRB3-6-e00464-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验