Meijering Louise, Weitkamp Gerd
Population Research Centre, Urban and Regional Studies Institute, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Cultural Geography, Urban and Regional Studies Institute, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov;168:200-206. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
The aim of this methods-focused article is to explore the potential benefits of integrating GPS, diary and in-depth interview data to gain richer insights into the everyday mobility practices of older adults. Eighteen adults, aged 65-90 years, living in the Netherlands, participated in the study. Our findings illustrate how quantitative (GPS) and qualitative (interviews and diary-based) approaches together can generate different insights and layers of understanding from each individual method in order to enhance the overall study findings. Our findings demonstrate that our methodological approach generates new insights with respect to GPS-measured and self-reported mobility, time-geographies, and micro-geographies of older adults in the Netherlands. In conclusion, our mixed-methods approach contributes to a better understanding of the everyday mobility practices of older adults, and could be used in other demographic groups.
这篇聚焦方法的文章旨在探讨整合全球定位系统(GPS)、日记和深度访谈数据的潜在益处,以便更深入地了解老年人的日常出行行为。18名年龄在65至90岁之间、居住在荷兰的成年人参与了这项研究。我们的研究结果表明,定量(GPS)和定性(访谈及基于日记)方法相结合,能够从每种单独方法中产生不同的见解和理解层面,从而增强整体研究结果。我们的研究结果证明,我们的方法论方法在荷兰老年人的GPS测量出行和自我报告出行、时间地理学以及微观地理学方面产生了新的见解。总之,我们的混合方法有助于更好地理解老年人的日常出行行为,并且可应用于其他人口群体。