Bora Emre, Veznedaroğlu Baybars, Vahip Simavi
The Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, VIC, Australia, 6328 Sok no:38/2, Yali Mahallesi, Izmir, Turkey; Ege University, Department of Psychiatry, Izmir, Turkey.
Schizophr Res. 2016 Oct;176(2-3):500-505. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
Executive dysfunction is a common feature of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (BP). While deficits in social cognitive abilities, including theory of mind (ToM), have been suggested to be specific to schizophrenia, available evidence suggests that there is also a significant overlap in social cognitive performances of both disorders. However, there is significant heterogeneity of executive dysfunction and ToM deficits in BP and schizophrenia. Cross-diagnostic data-driven methods can reveal potential neurocognitive subtypes characterized by relatively selective deficits in social cognition.
Neurocognitive subgroups were investigated using latent class analysis, based on executive functions and ToM, in a mixed sample of 97 clinically stable patients with schizophrenia or BP and 27 healthy controls.
Four neurocognitive subgroups, including a "neuropsychologically normal" cluster, a severe global impairment cluster and two clusters of mixed cognitive profiles were found. Severe impairment cluster was characterized by particularly severe ToM deficits and predominantly included patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia patients in this cluster had severe negative symptoms. In contrast, individuals with BP compared to schizophrenia patients were more likely to be included in the "neuropsychologically normal" cluster.
Identification of distinctive neurobiological subtypes of patients based on social and non-social cognitive profiles can improve classification of major psychoses. Neurocognitive subgroupings of patients might be also beneficial for intervention strategies including cognitive rehabilitation.
执行功能障碍是精神分裂症和双相情感障碍(BP)的常见特征。虽然社会认知能力缺陷,包括心理理论(ToM),被认为是精神分裂症所特有的,但现有证据表明,这两种疾病的社会认知表现也存在显著重叠。然而,BP和精神分裂症中的执行功能障碍和ToM缺陷存在显著异质性。跨诊断数据驱动方法可以揭示以社会认知相对选择性缺陷为特征的潜在神经认知亚型。
基于执行功能和ToM,使用潜在类别分析在97例临床稳定的精神分裂症或BP患者及27名健康对照的混合样本中研究神经认知亚组。
发现了四个神经认知亚组,包括一个“神经心理正常”组、一个严重整体损害组和两个混合认知特征组。严重损害组的特征是特别严重的ToM缺陷,主要包括精神分裂症患者。该组中的精神分裂症患者有严重的阴性症状。相比之下,与精神分裂症患者相比,BP患者更有可能被纳入“神经心理正常”组。
根据社会和非社会认知特征识别患者独特的神经生物学亚型可以改善主要精神病的分类。患者的神经认知亚组划分可能对包括认知康复在内的干预策略也有益。