• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌经肛提肌外与传统腹会阴联合切除术的系统评价和Meta分析

Extralevator vs conventional abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Negoi Ionut, Hostiuc Sorin, Paun Sorin, Negoi Ruxandra I, Beuran Mircea

机构信息

General Surgery Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, No. 37 Dionisie Lupu Street, Sector 2, 020021, Bucharest, Romania; General Surgery Department, Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.

General Surgery Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, No. 37 Dionisie Lupu Street, Sector 2, 020021, Bucharest, Romania; National Institute of Legal Medicine Mina Minovici, Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2016 Sep;212(3):511-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 May 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.02.022
PMID:27317475
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the short-term morbidity and long-term oncologic benefits of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) with conventional abdominoperineal resection (CAPR) for patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

Electronic search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Korean Journal, and J-EAST database from 2007 until August 2015 was carried out. We considered randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized comparative studies comparing ELAPE with CAPR to be eligible, if they included patients with rectal cancers.

RESULTS

A total of 1 randomized controlled trials and 10 nonrandomized comparative studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 1,736 patients in the ELAPE group and 1,320 in the CAPR group. The ELAPE was associated with a significantly lower intraoperative perforation rate. There were no differences regarding the circumferential margin involvement, R0 resections, and local recurrence rate. There was less blood loss in ELAPE patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ELAPE significantly lowered the intraoperative perforation rate, with no benefits regarding circumferential resection margin involvement and local recurrence rate.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较直肠癌患者行提肛外腹会阴联合切除术(ELAPE)与传统腹会阴联合切除术(CAPR)的短期发病率和长期肿瘤学获益。

方法

对2007年至2015年8月期间的Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、韩国期刊和J-EAST数据库进行电子检索。如果研究纳入了直肠癌患者,我们认为比较ELAPE与CAPR的随机对照试验和非随机对照研究符合纳入标准。

结果

共有1项随机对照试验和10项非随机对照研究符合纳入标准,ELAPE组有1736例患者,CAPR组有1320例患者。ELAPE的术中穿孔率显著降低。在环周切缘受累、R0切除和局部复发率方面没有差异。ELAPE患者的失血量较少。

结论

ELAPE显著降低了术中穿孔率,但在环周切缘受累和局部复发率方面没有获益。

相似文献

1
Extralevator vs conventional abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer-A systematic review and meta-analysis.直肠癌经肛提肌外与传统腹会阴联合切除术的系统评价和Meta分析
Am J Surg. 2016 Sep;212(3):511-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 May 11.
2
[Advantage of extralevator abdominoperineal excision comparing to the conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a Meta-analysis].[经腹会阴联合切除术与传统经腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的Meta分析:优势比较]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Mar 28;42(3):320-327. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2017.03.014.
3
Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review.经括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌后会阴部重建:系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Sep;14(9):1052-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03169.x.
4
Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer--a systematic overview.直肠癌经腹会阴联合切除术与标准经腹会阴联合切除术的比较——系统综述。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Oct;26(10):1227-40. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1235-3. Epub 2011 May 21.
5
Comparison of perineal morbidity between biologic mesh reconstruction and primary closure following extralevator abdominoperineal excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经括约肌间切除术(extralevator abdominoperineal excision)后,生物补片重建与一期缝合治疗会阴部并发症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 May;36(5):893-902. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03820-7. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
6
A systematic review of transabdominal levator division during abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APER).经腹肛提肌切开术在腹会阴直肠切除术(APER)中的系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Sep;21(9):701-707. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1682-0. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
7
Perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal excision or extralevator abdominoperineal excision: a systematic review of the literature.经腹会阴切除术后或经括约肌外腹会阴切除术后会阴疝修补术:文献系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 May;21(5):329-336. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1634-8. Epub 2017 May 15.
8
There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的疗效无差异:短期和长期肿瘤学结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1662-4. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
9
A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer.一项评估直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术和盆腔脏器清除术后切缘状态的系统评价
Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):291-299. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001963.
10
Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the short-term outcome.低位直肠癌的经提肌腹会阴联合切除术:短期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jun;17(6):474-81. doi: 10.1111/codi.12921.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidance on the Surgical Management of Rectal Cancer: An Umbrella Review.直肠癌手术管理指南:一项伞状综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;15(6):955. doi: 10.3390/life15060955.
2
Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (India Chapter) and Indian rectal cancer expert group's practical consensus statements for surgical management of localized and locally advanced rectal cancer.临床机器人外科学会(印度分会)及印度直肠癌专家组关于局部及局部进展期直肠癌外科治疗的实用共识声明
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 4;12:1002530. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1002530. eCollection 2022.
3
A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK.
一项关于标准及经肛提肌外腹会阴切除术会阴重建的英国全国性调查:当前实践与趋势
Cureus. 2022 Aug 24;14(8):e28339. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28339. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Meta-analysis of biological mesh reconstruction versus primary perineal closure after abdominoperineal excision of rectal cancer.直肠癌腹会阴切除术后生物网片重建与一期会阴缝合的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;36(3):477-492. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03827-0. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
5
Selection and Outcomes in Abdominoperineal Resection.腹会阴联合切除术的选择与结果
Front Oncol. 2020 Aug 18;10:1339. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01339. eCollection 2020.
6
Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.经括约肌间切除与腹会阴联合切除治疗低位直肠癌的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Oct 20;132(20):2446-2456. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000485.
7
Long-term outcomes of biological mesh repair following extra levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: an observational study of 100 patients.直肠外括约肌切开会阴直肠切除术 100 例患者的生物网片修补后长期结局:一项观察性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Aug;23(8):761-767. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02056-0. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
8
Case series of in situ pelvic floor reconstruction combining levator ani suture and negative pressure wound therapy for abdominoperineal resection.腹会阴联合切除术中采用肛提肌缝合与负压伤口治疗相结合的原位盆底重建病例系列
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 May 31;43:64-67. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.05.014. eCollection 2019 Jul.
9
[Assessment of individualized treatment of rectal carcinoma].[直肠癌个体化治疗的评估]
Chirurg. 2019 Apr;90(4):279-286. doi: 10.1007/s00104-019-0807-6.
10
Perioperative and oncological outcomes of abdominoperineal resection in the prone position vs the classic lithotomy position: A systematic review with meta-analysis.俯卧位与经典截石位腹会阴联合切除术的围手术期及肿瘤学结局:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;119(7):979-986. doi: 10.1002/jso.25402. Epub 2019 Feb 6.