Shah Rushabh, Kamble Rituja, Herieka Mohammed, Dalal Milind
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Foundation Trust, Plymouth, GBR.
Cureus. 2022 Aug 24;14(8):e28339. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28339. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Background Challenging perineal defects resulting from extralevator (ELAPE) and standard abdominoperineal excision (APE) have given rise to an emerging multidisciplinary approach between colorectal and plastic surgeons. At present, there is a relative paucity of evidence on best practice. This study sought to assess current national practice concerning perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE in the United Kingdom (UK) and to determine the factors involved in reconstruction choice. Methodology An anonymised survey was circulated to consultant plastic surgeons at all 48 UK centres performing perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE. Responses were collected between October 2021 and April 2022. Results Complete responses were received from 24 units nationally. All units had a dedicated APE/ELAPE service. Overall, 70% adopted a standardised reconstructive approach, the most common being the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 11). Significant variation was identified in the reconstructive technique. Similar differences were observed in the perceived importance of surgical factors guiding the reconstructive decision-making process, the top priorities being the size of the defect and previous radiotherapy. Conclusions The variability of responses suggests a lack of national consensus on optimal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE, despite the majority of centres employing a standardised approach to reconstruction. Our study highlights important surgical decision-making factors and provides valuable insight to aid in developing national collaborative evidence-based guidelines on best practice.
由肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术(ELAPE)和标准腹会阴联合切除术(APE)导致的具有挑战性的会阴缺损,促使结直肠外科医生和整形外科医生之间形成了一种新的多学科治疗方法。目前,关于最佳实践的证据相对较少。本研究旨在评估英国目前关于APE/ELAPE术后会阴重建的全国性实践,并确定重建选择所涉及的因素。方法:向英国所有48个进行APE/ELAPE术后会阴重建的中心的整形外科顾问医生发放了一份匿名调查问卷。在2021年10月至2022年4月期间收集了回复。结果:全国范围内有24个单位给出了完整回复。所有单位都有专门的APE/ELAPE服务。总体而言,70%的单位采用标准化重建方法,最常见的是臀下动脉穿支皮瓣(n = 11)。在重建技术方面发现了显著差异。在指导重建决策过程的手术因素的重要性认知方面也观察到了类似差异,首要考虑因素是缺损大小和既往放疗情况。结论:尽管大多数中心采用标准化重建方法,但回复的变异性表明在APE/ELAPE术后最佳重建方面缺乏全国性共识。我们的研究突出了重要的手术决策因素,并为制定基于证据的全国性最佳实践协作指南提供了有价值的见解。