• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算澳大利亚队列中肺癌筛查的适宜性,包括肺量测定法的影响。

Estimating eligibility for lung cancer screening in an Australian cohort, including the effect of spirometry.

机构信息

Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA

Busselton Population Medical Research Institute, Busselton, WA.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2016 Jun 20;204(11):406. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00043.

DOI:10.5694/mja16.00043
PMID:27318396
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the proportion of ever-smokers who are eligible for lung cancer screening in an Australian cohort, and to evaluate the effect of spirometry in defining chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when assessing screening eligibility.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of 3586 individuals aged 50-68 years who live in the Busselton Shire of Western Australia.

OUTCOMES

Proportion of ever-smokers eligible for lung cancer screening based on United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria, and PLCOm2012 lung cancer risk > 1.5%. The effect of using self-reported COPD, symptoms consistent with COPD, or spirometry to define COPD for screening eligibility according to the PLCOm2012 criteria.

RESULTS

Of ever-smokers aged 55-68 years, 254 (20.1%) would be eligible for screening according to USPSTF criteria; fewer would be eligible according to PLCOm2012 criteria (225, 17.9%; P = 0.004). This is equivalent to 8.9-10.0% of the total population aged 55-68 years, which suggests about 450 000 individuals in Australia may be eligible for lung cancer screening. The proportions of eligible participants were not significantly different whether spirometry results or symptoms consistent with COPD were used to determine PLCOm2012 risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of ever-smokers in this population who were eligible for lung cancer screening was 17.9-20.1%. Using symptoms to define COPD is an appropriate surrogate measure for spirometry when determining the presence of COPD in this population. There are significant challenges for policy makers on how to identify and recruit these eligible individuals from the wider population.

摘要

目的

评估澳大利亚队列中符合肺癌筛查条件的曾吸烟者比例,并评估在评估筛查资格时使用肺活量计定义慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)对定义 COPD 的影响。

设计

对居住在西澳大利亚州巴斯顿郡的 3586 名年龄在 50-68 岁的个体进行横断面研究。

结果

根据美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)标准和 PLCOm2012 肺癌风险>1.5%,确定曾吸烟者中符合肺癌筛查条件的比例。根据 PLCOm2012 标准,使用自我报告的 COPD、与 COPD 一致的症状或肺活量计来定义 COPD 对筛查资格的影响。

结论

根据 USPSTF 标准,55-68 岁的曾吸烟者中,有 254 人(20.1%)符合筛查条件;根据 PLCOm2012 标准,符合条件的人数更少(225 人,17.9%;P=0.004)。这相当于 55-68 岁总人群的 8.9-10.0%,表明澳大利亚约有 450000 人可能有资格接受肺癌筛查。无论使用肺活量计结果还是与 COPD 一致的症状来确定 PLCOm2012 风险,符合条件的参与者比例均无显着差异。

结论

该人群中曾吸烟者中有 17.9-20.1%符合肺癌筛查条件。在确定该人群中 COPD 的存在时,使用症状来定义 COPD 是肺活量计的合适替代指标。政策制定者在如何从更广泛的人群中识别和招募这些合格的个体方面面临重大挑战。

相似文献

1
Estimating eligibility for lung cancer screening in an Australian cohort, including the effect of spirometry.估算澳大利亚队列中肺癌筛查的适宜性,包括肺量测定法的影响。
Med J Aust. 2016 Jun 20;204(11):406. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00043.
2
Addressing Sex Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility: USPSTF vs PLCOm2012 Criteria.解决肺癌筛查资格方面的性别差异:美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)与PLCOm2012标准对比
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):248-256. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.066. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
Risk Prediction Model Versus United States Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria: Reducing Race Disparities.风险预测模型与美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查资格标准:减少种族差异。
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Nov;15(11):1738-1747. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
4
Low rates of eligibility for lung cancer screening in patients undergoing computed tomography coronary angiography.接受计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影的患者中,肺癌筛查的符合率较低。
Intern Med J. 2018 Oct;48(10):1265-1268. doi: 10.1111/imj.14061.
5
Spirometry performed as part of the Manchester community-based lung cancer screening programme detects a high prevalence of airflow obstruction in individuals without a prior diagnosis of COPD.在曼彻斯特社区为肺癌筛查项目进行的肺量测定术发现,在没有 COPD 既往诊断的个体中,气流阻塞的流行率很高。
Thorax. 2020 Aug;75(8):655-660. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213584. Epub 2020 May 22.
6
Identifying high risk individuals for targeted lung cancer screening: Independent validation of the PLCO risk prediction tool.确定高危人群进行有针对性的肺癌筛查:PLCO 风险预测工具的独立验证。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jul 15;141(2):242-253. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30673. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
7
USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (International Lung Screening Trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.USPSTF2013 与 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准(国际肺癌筛查试验):前瞻性队列研究的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):138-148. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00590-8. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
8
Sensitivity of US Preventive Services Task Force and PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria in individuals with lung cancer in South Dakota self-reporting as Indigenous and non-Indigenous.南达科他州肺癌患者自我报告为原住民和非原住民的情况下,美国预防服务工作组和 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准的敏感性。
Cancer. 2023 Dec 15;129(24):3894-3904. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34947. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
9
Risk prediction models versus simplified selection criteria to determine eligibility for lung cancer screening: an analysis of German federal-wide survey and incidence data.风险预测模型与简化选择标准在确定肺癌筛查资格中的比较:基于德国联邦范围调查和发病数据的分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;35(10):899-912. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00657-w. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
10
Comparison Between the 2021 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Criteria and Other Lung Cancer Screening Criteria for Racial Disparity in Eligibility.2021 年 USPSTF 肺癌筛查标准与其他肺癌筛查标准在资格方面的种族差异比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;8(3):374-382. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6720.