Bruijnzeel Hanneke, van den Aardweg Maaike T, Grolman Wilko, Stegeman Inge, van der Veen Erwin L
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Central Military Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jul;126(7):1535-44. doi: 10.1002/lary.25829. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Preauricular sinuses are benign congenital malformations of preauricular soft tissues. Complete excision using either sinectomy or supra-auricular approach is advised to prevent recurrence. Reported recurrence varies between 0 and 42%. We evaluated which surgical technique resulted in lowest complication and recurrence rates.
PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science.
Two authors appraised studies on directness of evidence and risk of bias. Original data were extracted and pooled when I(2) was smaller than 50%. Results are reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.
Fourteen high directness of evidence studies were included. Reported complication rates were similar: sinectomy [0-31.4%] and supra-auricular approach (SAA) [0-18.2%]. Pooled recurrence rates showed that sinectomy resulted in significantly (P = .04) more recurrence 5.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-8.3%) than SAA 2.2% (95% CI 0.7-7.0). Sinectomy using the microscope resulted in the lowest sinectomy recurrence rates (1.9%). SAA in combination with a Penrose drain resulted in 0% recurrence in revision cases. Drain use resulted in the lowest SAA recurrence rates; however, drain application was not advised due to higher complication rates (frequent wound infection [P = .003] and more [P = .002] and longer [P = .001] compression dressing use).
SAA could be the preferable technique for preauricular sinus removal. If despite evidence, sinectomy is elected over SAA, microscope use can further decrease recurrence rates comparable to SAA levels. Level of included evidence (Ib-IV) indicates the need for a prospective study comparing surgical outcomes between techniques. Laryngoscope, 126:1535-1544, 2016.
目的/假设:耳前窦是耳前软组织的良性先天性畸形。建议采用窦切除术或耳上入路进行完整切除以防止复发。报道的复发率在0%至42%之间。我们评估了哪种手术技术导致的并发症和复发率最低。
检索了PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science数据库。
两位作者评估了证据的直接性和偏倚风险的研究。当I²小于50%时,提取并汇总原始数据。结果根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目进行报告。
纳入了14项证据直接性高的研究。报道的并发症发生率相似:窦切除术[0% - 31.4%]和耳上入路(SAA)[0% - 18.2%]。汇总复发率显示,窦切除术的复发率(5.5%,95%置信区间[CI] 3.6 - 8.3%)显著(P = 0.04)高于SAA的复发率(2.2%,95% CI 0.7 - 7.0%)。使用显微镜进行窦切除术导致的复发率最低(1.9%)。SAA联合使用彭罗斯引流管在翻修病例中的复发率为0%。使用引流管导致SAA的复发率最低;然而,由于并发症发生率较高(频繁伤口感染[P = 0.003]以及更多[P = 0.002]和更长时间[P = 0.001]使用压迫敷料),不建议使用引流管。
SAA可能是切除耳前窦的首选技术。如果尽管有证据,但仍选择窦切除术而非SAA,使用显微镜可进一步降低复发率至与SAA相当的水平。纳入证据的级别(Ib - IV)表明需要进行一项前瞻性研究来比较不同技术之间的手术结果。《喉镜》,126:1535 - 1544,2016年。