• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of cytobrush with cotton swab for endocervical cytologic sampling.

作者信息

Neinstein L S, Rabinovitz S, Recalde A

机构信息

Teenage Health Center, Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles, CA 90027.

出版信息

J Adolesc Health Care. 1989 Jul;10(4):305-7. doi: 10.1016/0197-0070(89)90062-4.

DOI:10.1016/0197-0070(89)90062-4
PMID:2732111
Abstract

This study was designed to compare the Ayres spatula/cytobrush combination with the Ayres spatula/cotton swab combination as to the quality of the Pap smear in adolescent females. We evaluated 111 Pap smears, of which 60 (54%) were from cotton applicators/spatula combination and 51 (46%) were from cytobrush/spatula combination. Seventy-nine percent of the specimens with the cytobrush showed good cellular yield, compared to only 50% of the specimens obtained with a cotton applicator (p less than 0.05). The adequate specimen rate for endocervical cell content was 68% for the cytobrush versus 56% for the cotton applicator (p = not significant). The adequacy rate was less for trainees than for attending physicians, but the difference was less marked for those using the cytobrush. The cytobrush does have some impact on improving adequacy rates for Pap smears. However, this study was unable to determine whether this is a cost-effective addition to the Ayres spatula or cotton swab. The problem of inadequate Pap smears deserves more scrutiny among various health care systems.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of cytobrush with cotton swab for endocervical cytologic sampling.
J Adolesc Health Care. 1989 Jul;10(4):305-7. doi: 10.1016/0197-0070(89)90062-4.
2
Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling.宫颈内细胞学取样中细胞刷与宫颈刷的比较。
J Adolesc Health. 1992 Sep;13(6):520-3. doi: 10.1016/1054-139x(92)90017-6.
3
The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.宫颈细胞刷对巴氏涂片取材充分性的影响。
Fam Pract Res J. 1991 Mar;11(1):57-64.
4
A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;80(2):241-5.
5
Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
Acta Cytol. 1989 Nov-Dec;33(6):849-51.
6
Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.孕妇宫颈细胞刷和宫颈刷的评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;84(4):539-43.
7
Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1989 Jul-Sep;2(3):156-60.
8
Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.使用细胞刷改进宫颈管取样。
CMAJ. 1991 Feb 1;144(3):313-7.
9
Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
Nurse Pract. 1990 Nov;15(11):30-2.
10
Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.宫颈细胞学检查:四种采样方法的随机对照比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jun;166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91568-u.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening Sexually Active Teenagers for Cervical Abnormalities: Its importance for sexually active teenagers.为活跃期青少年筛查宫颈异常:为活跃期青少年筛查宫颈异常的重要性。
Can Fam Physician. 1991 May;37:1165-9.
2
Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.用于获取宫颈细胞学样本的采集装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(2):CD001036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001036.