Suppr超能文献

用于获取宫颈细胞学样本的采集装置。

Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.

作者信息

Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R

机构信息

University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Whitworth Park, Manchester, UK, M13 0JH.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(2):CD001036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001036.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The false-negative rate of cervical smears varies between 1.5% and 55%. This variation may be partly due to differences in sampling device and technique. The objective of this review was to assess different cervical sampling devices for collecting endocervical cells, which are thought to be a surrogate for detection of abnormal cells and adequate smear rates.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group trials register and MEDLINE up to July 1997. We also handsearched 16 journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials and non-randomised comparative studies comparing cervical smear collection devices in women attending for primary screening, colposcopy following an abnormal smear or colposcopy after treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently abstracted data. Study quality was assessed.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-four trials and six observational comparative studies were included. The Ayre spatula was shown to be less effective compared with extended tip spatulas for collecting endocervical cells in eight trials (odds ratio 2.25, 95% confidence interval 2.06 to 2.44). Use of a spatula with the cytobrush was more effective than spatula alone at collecting endocervical cells (odds ratio 3.33, 95% 3.05 to 3.63) and the same effect was present for adequate smear rates (odds ratio 1.51 95% 1.19-1.92). Extended tip spatulas were also superior for the detection of dyskaryosis in seven trials (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.33). Based on data from two trials and three observational studies, smears that contained endocervical cells were more likely to detect dyskaryosis, particularly in severe disease. The proportion of smears with endocervical cells present increased with increasing severity of the disease.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Extended tip spatulas of various designs appear to be better for collecting endocervical cells than the commonly used Ayre spatula. The most effective combination appears to be the cytobrush with an extended tip spatula. The rate of detection of endocervical cells appears to be a valid and convenient surrogate for the ability to detect dyskaryosis and for adequate smear rates. The ability of the extended tip spatula with the cytobrush compared with the extended tip spatula alone to detect disease, needs to be evaluated in a trial.

摘要

目的

宫颈涂片的假阴性率在1.5%至55%之间。这种差异可能部分归因于采样设备和技术的不同。本综述的目的是评估用于采集宫颈管细胞的不同宫颈采样设备,宫颈管细胞被认为是检测异常细胞和足够涂片率的替代指标。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane妇科癌症小组试验注册库以及截至1997年7月的MEDLINE。我们还手工检索了16种期刊。

选择标准

比较初次筛查、异常涂片后阴道镜检查或治疗后阴道镜检查的女性中宫颈涂片采集设备的随机和半随机试验以及非随机对照研究。

数据收集与分析

两名评价员独立提取数据。评估研究质量。

主要结果

纳入了34项试验和6项观察性对照研究。在8项试验中,与延长头刮板相比,Ayre刮板在采集宫颈管细胞方面效果较差(优势比2.25,95%置信区间2.06至2.44)。刮板与细胞刷联合使用在采集宫颈管细胞方面比单独使用刮板更有效(优势比3.33,95% 3.05至3.63),在足够涂片率方面也有相同效果(优势比1.51,95% 1.19 - 1.92)。在7项试验中,延长头刮板在检测核异质方面也更具优势(优势比1.21,95%置信区间1.10至1.33)。基于两项试验和三项观察性研究的数据,含有宫颈管细胞的涂片更有可能检测到核异质,尤其是在严重疾病中。含有宫颈管细胞的涂片比例随疾病严重程度增加而升高。

综述作者结论

各种设计的延长头刮板在采集宫颈管细胞方面似乎比常用的Ayre刮板更好。最有效的组合似乎是细胞刷与延长头刮板。宫颈管细胞的检出率似乎是检测核异质能力和足够涂片率的有效且便捷的替代指标。与单独使用延长头刮板相比,细胞刷与延长头刮板联合检测疾病的能力需要在一项试验中进行评估。

相似文献

1
Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(2):CD001036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001036.
2
Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(3):CD001036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001036.
3
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD000213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000213.
4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
7
Sertindole for schizophrenia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
8
Herbal and dietary therapies for primary and secondary dysmenorrhoea.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD002124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002124.
9
Interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 9;7(7):CD011492. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011492.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of cytobrush for bacteriological and cytological diagnosis of endometritis in mares.
Vet World. 2024 Feb;17(2):398-406. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.398-406. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
3
Papanicolaou test collection with the Papette brush or the spatula with cytobrush: A pragmatic study.
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231170975. doi: 10.1177/17455057231170975.
4
Impact of New Collecting Instruments on Satisfactory Cervical Cytology in a Diagnostic Reference Center at Mexico City.
Indian J Community Med. 2021 Apr-Jun;46(2):340-341. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_397_20. Epub 2021 May 29.
5
Preoperative cervical cytology as a prognostic factor in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer: A single-center experience from Saudi Arabia.
Avicenna J Med. 2020 Jul 3;10(3):111-117. doi: 10.4103/ajm.ajm_147_19. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
7
Comparison of vaginal microbiota sampling techniques: cytobrush versus swab.
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 29;7(1):9802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09844-4.
8
Comparison of the Cervex-Brush® Combi and the Cytobrush+Ayres Spatula Combination for Cervical Sampling in Liquid-Based Cytology.
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 14;11(10):e0164077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164077. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

2
Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
Cytopathology. 1995 Oct;6(5):301-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1995.tb00575.x.
3
A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Nov;35(4):446-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb02165.x.
4
Endocervical detection of CIN. Cytobrush versus cotton.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1993;14(3):234-6.
5
A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 Feb;48(2):103-6. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90248-b.
6
Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the effect of the sampling sequence.
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1993 Mar-Apr;6(2):103-7.
7
Cytological reporting of cervical abnormalities according to endocervical status.
Br J Cancer. 1993 Mar;67(3):585-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.107.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验