Suppr超能文献

无缺血性心脏病成人室内传导延迟的三十年生存分析

A Three-Decade Survival Analysis of Intraventricular Conduction Delay in Adults Without Ischemic Heart Disease.

作者信息

Tiosano Shmuel, Hod Hanoch, Oberman Bernice, Chetrit Angela, Dankner Rachel

机构信息

Department of Medicine 'B', Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel; The Olga and Lev Leviev Heart Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2016 Nov;129(11):1219.e11-1219.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of an incidental finding of intraventricular conduction delay in individuals without ischemic heart disease is debatable. Intraventricular conduction delay presents electrocardiographically as bundle branch block or nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay. We aimed to assess the long-term survival of an incidental intraventricular conduction delay finding in a cohort of individuals without ischemic heart disease, followed up for 3 decades.

METHODS

A randomized stratified cohort of the adult Israeli population underwent medical examinations and electrocardiography between 1976 and 1982. Patients with ischemic heart disease were excluded, and the cohort was followed for all-cause mortality for a median of 30.4 years. Major intraventricular conduction delay was defined as having complete bundle branch block or nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay, and minor intraventricular conduction delay was defined as having incomplete bundle branch block. Cox proportional hazard model was performed, comparing individuals by electrocardiogram finding, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and electrocardiographic variables.

RESULTS

Of 2465 subjects, 2385 (96.8%) were without intraventricular conduction delay, 38 (1.5%) had minor intraventricular conduction delay, and 42 (1.7%) had major intraventricular conduction delay. All-cause mortality rates were higher among minor and major intraventricular conduction delay groups (57.9% and 66.7%, P = .43 and P = .04, respectively) compared with no intraventricular conduction delay (52.1%). By controlling for sex, age, and body mass index, intraventricular conduction delay was not associated with all-cause mortality: hazard ratios, 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.25) and 1.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.54) for minor and major intraventricular conduction delay, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraventricular conduction delay was not found to be an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in individuals without ischemic heart disease.

摘要

背景

在无缺血性心脏病的个体中偶然发现室内传导延迟的预后存在争议。室内传导延迟在心电图上表现为束支传导阻滞或非特异性室内传导延迟。我们旨在评估在一组无缺血性心脏病且随访30年的个体中偶然发现室内传导延迟后的长期生存率。

方法

1976年至1982年间,对以色列成年人群进行随机分层队列研究,进行医学检查和心电图检查。排除缺血性心脏病患者,对该队列进行全因死亡率随访,中位随访时间为30.4年。主要室内传导延迟定义为完全性束支传导阻滞或非特异性室内传导延迟,次要室内传导延迟定义为不完全性束支传导阻滞。采用Cox比例风险模型,根据心电图结果对个体进行比较,并对人口统计学、临床和心电图变量进行调整。

结果

在2465名受试者中,2385名(96.8%)无室内传导延迟,38名(1.5%)有次要室内传导延迟,42名(1.7%)有主要室内传导延迟。次要和主要室内传导延迟组的全因死亡率(分别为57.9%和66.7%,P = 0.43和P = 0.04)高于无室内传导延迟组(52.1%)。通过控制性别、年龄和体重指数,室内传导延迟与全因死亡率无关:次要和主要室内传导延迟的风险比分别为0.82(95%置信区间,0.52 - 1.25)和1.06(95%置信区间,0.72 - 1.54)。

结论

在无缺血性心脏病的个体中,未发现室内传导延迟是全因死亡率的独立危险因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验