Frew Paula M, Kriss Jennifer L, Chamberlain Allison T, Malik Fauzia, Chung Yunmi, Cortés Marielysse, Omer Saad B
a Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases , Atlanta , GA , USA.
b Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health , Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Aug 2;12(8):1989-1996. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1199309.
We sought to examine the effectiveness of persuasive communication interventions on influenza vaccination uptake among black/African American pregnant women in Atlanta, Georgia.
We recruited black/African American pregnant women ages 18 to 50 y from Atlanta, GA to participate in a prospective, randomized controlled trial of influenza immunization messaging conducted from January to April 2013. Eligible participants were randomized to 3 study arms. We conducted follow-up questionnaires on influenza immunization at 30-days post-partum with all groups. Chi-square and t tests evaluated group differences, and outcome intention-to-treat assessment utilized log-binomial regression models.
Of the 106 enrolled, 95 women completed the study (90% retention), of which 31 were randomly assigned to affective messaging intervention ("Pregnant Pause" video), 30 to cognitive messaging intervention ("Vaccines for a Healthy Pregnancy" video), and 34 to a comparison condition (receipt of the Influenza Vaccine Information Statement). The three groups were balanced on baseline demographic characteristics and reported health behaviors. At baseline, most women (63%, n = 60) reported no receipt of seasonal influenza immunization during the previous 5 y. They expressed a low likelihood (2.1 ± 2.8 on 0-10 scale) of obtaining influenza immunization during their current pregnancy. At 30-days postpartum follow-up, influenza immunization was low among all participants (7-13%) demonstrating no effect after a single exposure to either affective messaging (RR = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.30-4.01) or cognitive messaging interventions (RR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.11-2.88). Women cited various reasons for not obtaining maternal influenza immunizations. These included concern about vaccine harm (47%, n = 40), low perceived influenza infection risk (31%, n = 26), and a history of immunization nonreceipt (24%, n = 20).
The findings reflect the limitations associated with a single exposure to varying maternal influenza immunization message approaches on vaccine behavior. For this population, repeated influenza immunization exposures may be warranted with alterations in message format, content, and relevance for coverage improvement.
我们试图研究说服性沟通干预措施对佐治亚州亚特兰大市黑人/非裔美国孕妇流感疫苗接种率的有效性。
我们从佐治亚州亚特兰大市招募了年龄在18至50岁之间的黑人/非裔美国孕妇,参与2013年1月至4月进行的一项关于流感免疫信息的前瞻性随机对照试验。符合条件的参与者被随机分为3个研究组。我们对所有组在产后30天进行了关于流感免疫的随访问卷调查。卡方检验和t检验评估组间差异,结局意向性分析采用对数二项回归模型。
在106名登记参与者中,95名女性完成了研究(保留率90%),其中31名被随机分配到情感信息干预组(“孕期停顿”视频),30名被分配到认知信息干预组(“孕期健康疫苗”视频),34名被分配到对照组(收到流感疫苗信息声明)。三组在基线人口统计学特征和报告的健康行为方面保持平衡。在基线时,大多数女性(63%,n = 60)报告在过去5年中未接种季节性流感疫苗。她们表示在当前孕期接种流感疫苗的可能性较低(在0至10分的量表上为2.1±2.8)。在产后30天的随访中,所有参与者的流感疫苗接种率都很低(7 - 13%),表明单次接触情感信息(RR = 1.10;95% CI:0.30 - 4.01)或认知信息干预后均无效果(RR = 0.57;95% CI:0.11 - 2.88)。女性列举了未接种孕妇流感疫苗的各种原因。这些原因包括担心疫苗危害(47%,n = 40)、感知到的流感感染风险低(31%,n = 26)以及有未接种疫苗的历史(24%,n = 20)。
研究结果反映了单次接触不同的孕妇流感免疫信息传递方式对疫苗接种行为的局限性。对于这一人群,可能需要通过改变信息形式、内容和相关性进行重复的流感免疫信息传递,以提高疫苗接种覆盖率。