Suppr超能文献

特应性皮炎症状测量工具的测量特性评估:系统评价。

Evaluation of the measurement properties of symptom measurement instruments for atopic eczema: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Allergy. 2017 Jan;72(1):146-163. doi: 10.1111/all.12959. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Symptoms have been identified as a core outcome domain for atopic eczema (AE) trials. Various instruments exist to measure symptoms in AE, but they vary in quality and there is a lack of standardization between clinical trials. Our objective was to systematically evaluate the quality of the evidence on the measurement properties of AE symptom instruments, thereby informing consensus discussions within the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative regarding the most appropriate instruments for the core outcome domain symptoms.

METHODS

Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist and predefined criteria for good measurement properties on identified development and validation studies of AE symptom instruments, a best evidence synthesis was performed to draw an overall conclusion on quality of the instruments and to provide recommendations.

RESULTS

Eighteen instruments were identified and evaluated. When the quality and results of the studies were considered, only five of these instruments had sufficient validation data to consider them for the core outcome set for the core outcome domain symptoms. These were the paediatric Itch Severity Scale (ISS), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Patient-Oriented SCOring Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD), Self-Administered Eczema Area and Severity Index (SA-EASI) and adapted SA-EASI.

CONCLUSIONS

ISS (paediatric version), POEM, PO-SCORAD, SA-EASI and adapted SA-EASI are currently the most appropriate instruments and therefore have the potential to be recommended as core symptom instrument in future clinical trials. These findings will be utilized for the development of a core outcome set for AE.

摘要

背景

症状已被确定为特应性皮炎(AE)试验的核心结局领域。有各种工具可用于测量 AE 中的症状,但它们的质量参差不齐,临床试验之间缺乏标准化。我们的目标是系统地评估 AE 症状工具测量特性的证据质量,从而为协调特应性皮炎结局测量(HOME)倡议内的共识讨论提供信息,确定最适合核心结局领域症状的工具。

方法

使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单和针对 AE 症状工具的既定开发和验证研究的良好测量特性的预设标准,对最佳证据进行综合分析,得出工具质量的总体结论,并提供建议。

结果

确定并评估了 18 种工具。考虑到研究的质量和结果,只有其中 5 种工具具有足够的验证数据,可以考虑将其纳入核心结局集,作为核心结局领域症状的核心结局工具。这些工具是儿童瘙痒严重程度量表(ISS)、患者导向的湿疹量表(POEM)、患者导向的特应性皮炎评分(PO-SCORAD)、自我管理的湿疹面积和严重程度指数(SA-EASI)和改良的 SA-EASI。

结论

ISS(儿科版)、POEM、PO-SCORAD、SA-EASI 和改良的 SA-EASI 是目前最合适的工具,因此有可能被推荐为未来临床试验的核心症状工具。这些发现将用于制定 AE 的核心结局集。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验