• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按年龄或诊断年龄分层的2型糖尿病降糖治疗疗效的荟萃分析。

Efficacy of hypoglycemic treatment in type 2 diabetes stratified by age or diagnosed age: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Cai Xiaoling, Yang Wenjia, Chen Yifei, Gao Xueying, Zhou Lingli, Zhang Simin, Han Xueyao, Ji Linong

机构信息

a Endocrine & Metabolism Department , Peking University People's Hospital , Beijing , China.

出版信息

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016 Aug;17(12):1591-8. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1202921. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1080/14656566.2016.1202921
PMID:27322963
Abstract

AIM

To compare the effects of blood glucose lowering regimens in groups of patients categorized by baseline age and diagnosed age.

METHODS

Placebo-controlled randomized trials in type 2 diabetes patients with a study length ≥12 weeks were included.

RESULTS

A total of 246 trials were included. HbA1c changes from baseline corrected by placebo were comparable in sulfonylurea treatment between older and younger patients' groups (weighted mean difference (WMD), -1.28% vs -0.92%, p > 0.05). Treatment with metformin between groups resulted in a comparable change in HbA1c levels (WMD, -0.97% vs -1.23%, p > 0.05). Treatment with α-glucosidase inhibitor (WMD, -0.68% vs -0.67%, p > 0.05), treatment with thiazolidinedione (WMD, -0.74% vs -1.01%, p > 0.05), treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors (WMD, -0.67% vs -0.67%, p > 0.05), and treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors (WMD, -0.54% vs -0.67%, p > 0.05) between groups also resulted in comparable HbA1c changes. Treatment with GLP-1 analogs between groups in HbA1c changes were also comparable (p > 0.05). Regression analysis indicated that the baseline age or diagnosed age was not associated with the HbA1c changes from baseline.

CONCLUSION

In each hypoglycemic treatment, the baseline age or diagnosed age was not associated with the HbA1c changes from baseline.

摘要

目的

比较按基线年龄和确诊年龄分类的患者组中降血糖方案的效果。

方法

纳入研究时长≥12周的2型糖尿病患者的安慰剂对照随机试验。

结果

共纳入246项试验。老年患者组和年轻患者组使用磺脲类药物治疗时,经安慰剂校正后的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)自基线的变化相当(加权平均差(WMD),-1.28%对-0.92%,p>0.05)。两组间使用二甲双胍治疗导致HbA1c水平变化相当(WMD,-0.97%对-1.23%,p>0.05)。使用α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂治疗(WMD,-0.68%对-0.67%,p>0.05)、使用噻唑烷二酮类药物治疗(WMD,-0.74%对-1.01%,p>0.05)、使用二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂治疗(WMD,-0.67%对-0.67%,p>0.05)以及使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂治疗(WMD,-0.54%对-0.67%,p>0.05)时,两组间HbA1c变化也相当。两组间使用胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)类似物治疗时HbA1c变化也相当(p>0.05)。回归分析表明,基线年龄或确诊年龄与HbA1c自基线的变化无关。

结论

在每种降糖治疗中,基线年龄或确诊年龄与HbA1c自基线的变化无关。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of hypoglycemic treatment in type 2 diabetes stratified by age or diagnosed age: a meta-analysis.按年龄或诊断年龄分层的2型糖尿病降糖治疗疗效的荟萃分析。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016 Aug;17(12):1591-8. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1202921. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
2
Baseline Body Mass Index and the Efficacy of Hypoglycemic Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis.基线体重指数与2型糖尿病降糖治疗疗效:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0166625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166625. eCollection 2016.
3
Reduction in HbA1c with SGLT2 inhibitors vs. DPP-4 inhibitors as add-ons to metformin monotherapy according to baseline HbA1c: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.SGLT2 抑制剂与 DPP-4 抑制剂联合二甲双胍单药治疗与基线 HbA1c 相比降低 HbA1c:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Diabetes Metab. 2020 Jun;46(3):186-196. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
4
Change in glycated haemoglobin levels after initiating second-line therapy in type 2 diabetes: a primary care database study.2型糖尿病二线治疗起始后糖化血红蛋白水平的变化:一项初级保健数据库研究
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Aug;18(8):840-3. doi: 10.1111/dom.12673. Epub 2016 May 16.
5
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂在临床环境中治疗 2 型糖尿病的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2012 Mar 12;344:e1369. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1369.
6
Comparisons of the efficacy of glucose control, lipid profile, and β-cell function between DPP-4 inhibitors and AGI treatment in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis.二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂与α-糖苷酶抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制疗效、血脂谱及β细胞功能比较:一项荟萃分析
Endocrine. 2015 Dec;50(3):590-7. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0653-3. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
7
Comparison of Placebo Effect between Asian and Caucasian Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Meta-Analysis.亚洲和高加索 2 型糖尿病患者安慰剂效应的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Jul 5;131(13):1605-1612. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.235107.
8
Network meta-analysis of treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus following failure with metformin plus sulfonylurea.二甲双胍加磺脲类药物治疗失败后2型糖尿病治疗的网状Meta分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 May;32(5):807-16. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1135110. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
9
Albiglutide efficacy and safety in the Latino/Hispanic subpopulation for the integrated phase III program.在整合的III期项目中,阿必鲁肽在拉丁裔/西班牙裔亚组中的疗效和安全性。
Postgrad Med. 2017 Nov;129(8):849-857. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1387473. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
10
Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as monotherapy or add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂单用或与二甲双胍联用治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):113-120. doi: 10.1111/dom.13047. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.报告和方法学质量的系统评价和荟萃分析与协议在 2 型糖尿病:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 16;15(12):e0243091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243091. eCollection 2020.